Anthropic-Pentagon AI Dispute
The policy battle over AI use in defense and the Pentagon's clash with Anthropic over safety guardrails.
Tell us where you stand
Answer the policy questions below. We'll map your positions to the bills in Congress and draft your message.
Artificial intelligence and biotech rules
1 bill on this topic
“Intelligence agencies should use new technology, but they should move carefully enough to protect security, accuracy, and basic public trust.”
Oversight of Pentagon AGI planning
1 bill on this topic
“Congress should maintain strict controls over how the Department of Defense moves and spends appropriated funds.”
Military artificial intelligence threats and defense
1 bill on this topic
“The United States should study how rival countries may use very powerful artificial intelligence and prepare defenses before those threats become real.”
Defense AI partnerships and funding
1 bill on this topic
“The Pentagon should be able to work with private companies and other innovators on advanced artificial intelligence, but Congress should decide how far it should go in using new funding tools to do that.”
Government control of military data in AI contracts
1 bill on this topic
“The government should keep strong control over its data in military AI and cloud contracts and tightly limit how contractors can use that data.”
Intelligence funding and oversight
1 bill on this topic
“Congress should fund intelligence work, but secret spending should still have clear guardrails and oversight.”
Intelligence workforce rules and benefits
1 bill on this topic
“Intelligence agencies should manage their workforce fairly and clearly, while making sure job rules and benefits match the realities of sensitive national-security work.”
Rules on military training, mandates, and research
1 bill on this topic
“Congress should use spending restrictions to limit diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and certain social policies within the Department of Defense.”
Operational powers and sensitive intelligence activity
1 bill on this topic
“Intelligence agencies sometimes need flexible operational tools, but those tools should be narrow enough to avoid unnecessary secrecy, safety risks, or abuse.”
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Your message will cover 4 bills in Congress
Why this actually works
01Lawmakers often don’t know what you think
A Yale field experiment found legislators shown actual district opinion shifted their votes to match it. The ones kept in the dark? No relationship between constituent views and how they voted.
02Congressional offices are built to process this
Offices log, sort, tag, and tally incoming contact, then brief the member. Constituent communications eat roughly a third of House staff resources. Your message gets counted.
03Personalized beats template, by a lot
92% of staff say individualized messages influence undecided lawmakers — versus 56% for form letters. Naming a specific bill with your own reasoning puts you in a different category entirely.
04Silence isn’t neutral
When offices don’t hear from constituents, they ask lobbyists instead. Not contacting your rep doesn’t leave the scale empty — it hands the weight to someone else.