People should know when important algorithms are being used, understand their basic rights, and have a fair chance to ask for a human decision or appeal.
Answer what matters
Skip any question. Your message only uses the topics and provisions you answer.
Related legislation
2 related bills are tracked for context, but none have a time-sensitive action window right now.
Track what happens
After sending, you can choose updates as votes, cosponsorships, and related bills move.
Official status
Enter your ZIP to see recorded votes, cosponsorships, and petition signatures tied to this subject.
We show sourced records and reviewed statements. We do not infer a broader issue stance from party, ideology, or a single unrelated vote.
Tell us where you stand
Answer the policy questions below or skip any that do not fit your view. We'll map only your answers to the bills in Congress and draft your message.
1 bill on this topic
“Companies and agencies that build or use important algorithms should have clear duties, honest marketing, and written rules for how data and responsibility are handled.”
1 bill on this topic
“AI systems used in major decisions should be tested, reviewed, and limited to uses they have been checked for.”
2 bills on this topic
“People should be told when AI affects important decisions and should have practical ways to understand, challenge, or report problems.”
2 bills on this topic
“Algorithms used for major decisions should not unfairly deny people jobs, housing, credit, health care, voting access, benefits, or other important services because of traits like race, sex, disability, age, or religion.”
1 bill on this topic
“The federal government should have trained staff and enough resources to oversee high-impact AI systems.”
Optional, but recommended. Your selections come from relevant bills in Congress; if something is missing or you want a specific point included, add it here.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Your message will cover 2 bills in Congress
A Yale field experiment found legislators shown actual district opinion shifted their votes to match it. The ones kept in the dark? No relationship between constituent views and how they voted.
Offices log, sort, tag, and tally incoming contact, then brief the member. Constituent communications eat roughly a third of House staff resources. Your message gets counted.
92% of staff say individualized messages influence undecided lawmakers — versus 56% for form letters. Naming a specific bill with your own reasoning puts you in a different category entirely.
When offices don’t hear from constituents, they ask lobbyists instead. Not contacting your rep doesn’t leave the scale empty — it hands the weight to someone else.
These are related bills tracked for context. None have a time-sensitive action window on this subject right now.
