U.S. reviews Iran's proposal for Strait of Hormuz
The White House has discussed Iran's proposal to end its blockade on the Strait of Hormuz. U.S. officials emphasize that any agreement must include a nuclear deal. (sources: nbcnews, dw, aljazeera, wsj, france24)
Trump met with national security advisers to review Iran's proposal. The U.S. has expressed skepticism about the plan without a nuclear agreement.
- Iran proposed to end its blockade on the Strait of Hormuz.
- The U.S. has not ruled out the proposal but insists on a nuclear deal.
- Trump discussed the proposal with national security advisers.
Why it matters
The outcome of these discussions could impact regional stability and oil prices.
↓ Why this is on ModernAction
5 bills on this issue are moving right now — and the most active one is A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress..
SJRES104 · 119th Congress
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
Where do you stand on this bill?
Takes about 60 seconds
About this bill
What SJRES104 actually does
This story is about U.S. appears cool on Iran proposal to end war and reopen Hormuz without a nuclear deal. This bill would direct the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities within/against Iran absent a declaration of war or.
If passed, it would:
- Direct the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities within/against Iran absent a declaration of war or • Still allow defensive actions as described in the resolution’s rule of construction.
4 other bills moving on this issue
Take action on any of them individually.
This story is about Iran war: US wary of peace plan postponing nuclear deal. This bill would impose sanctions on persons involved in logistical transactions and sanctions evasion related to Iranian oil, gas, LNG.
If passed, it would
- Impose sanctions on persons involved in logistical transactions and sanctions evasion related to Iranian oil, gas, LNG • Increase pressure/enforcement leverage around Iran’s energy-export supply chain during any “peace plan” or.
This story is about U.S. appears cool on Iran proposal to end war and reopen Hormuz without a nuclear deal. This bill would remove the sunset of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996, making it permanent.
If passed, it would
- Remove the sunset of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996, making it permanent • Maintain standing sanctions authority tied to Iran’s energy sector and WMD/terrorism-related conduct.
This story is about Iran war: US wary of peace plan postponing nuclear deal. This bill would impose sanctions regarding logistical transactions and sanctions evasion tied to Iranian oil, gas, LNG, and petrochemicals.
If passed, it would
- Impose sanctions regarding logistical transactions and sanctions evasion tied to Iranian oil, gas, LNG • Expand pressure on third parties facilitating Iranian energy exports.
This story is about US reaction to an Iranian proposal to end the war and reopen the Strait of Hormuz without a nuclear deal. The bill would prohibit federal funds from supporting US military force in or against Iran unless Congress gives new approval after the law takes effect.
If passed, it would
- Block federal funding for military force in or against Iran absent new congressional appro • Clarify that prior authorizations do not permit new military action and preserve a narrow.
Top coverage · 14 sources