U.S. reviews Iran's proposal for Strait of Hormuz
The White House has discussed Iran's proposal to end its blockade on the Strait of Hormuz. U.S. officials emphasize that any agreement must include a nuclear deal. (sources: nbcnews, dw, aljazeera, wsj, france24)
Trump met with national security advisers to review Iran's proposal. The U.S. has expressed skepticism about the plan without a nuclear agreement.
- Iran proposed to end its blockade on the Strait of Hormuz.
- The U.S. has not ruled out the proposal but insists on a nuclear deal.
- Trump discussed the proposal with national security advisers.
Why it matters
The outcome of these discussions could impact regional stability and oil prices.
↓ Why this is on ModernAction
5 bills on this issue are moving right now — and the most active one is Directing the President pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution to remove United States Armed Forces from unauthorized hostilities in the Islamic Republic of Iran..
HCONRES38 · 119th Congress
Directing the President pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution to remove United States Armed Forces from unauthorized hostilities in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Where do you stand on this bill?
Takes about 60 seconds
About this bill
What HCONRES38 actually does
This story is about U.S. appears cool on Iran proposal to end war and reopen Hormuz without a nuclear deal. This bill would direct the President to remove U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran.
If passed, it would:
- Direct the President (under the War Powers Resolution framework) to remove U.S • Force a clear congressional posture on continued U.S. military involvement.
4 other bills moving on this issue
Take action on any of them individually.
This story is about Iran war: US wary of peace plan postponing nuclear deal. This bill would impose sanctions on persons involved in logistical transactions and sanctions evasion related to Iranian oil, gas, LNG.
If passed, it would
- Impose sanctions on persons involved in logistical transactions and sanctions evasion related to Iranian oil, gas, LNG • Increase pressure/enforcement leverage around Iran’s energy-export supply chain during any “peace plan” or.
This story is about U.S. appears cool on Iran proposal to end war and reopen Hormuz without a nuclear deal. This bill would expand/mandate sanctions focused on the logistics and sanctions-evasion ecosystem supporting Iranian energy exports.
If passed, it would
- Expand/mandate sanctions focused on the logistics and sanctions-evasion ecosystem supporting Iranian energy exports • Increase enforcement pressure on facilitators (e.g., shipping/finance-related actors) tied to those exports.
This story is about U.S. appears cool on Iran proposal to end war and reopen Hormuz without a nuclear deal. This bill would add a formal congressional review step around certain Iran sanctions waiver/termination actions.
If passed, it would
- Add a formal congressional review step around certain Iran sanctions waiver/termination actions • Increase transparency and constrain how/when sanctions relief could be delivered in negotiations.
This story is about U.S. reaction to an Iranian proposal to end the war and reopen Hormuz without a nuclear deal. This bill would block federal funding for U.S. military force in or against Iran unless Congress gives new approval after it becomes law.
If passed, it would
- Prohibit federal funds for U.S. military action against Iran without new Congressional app • Keep a narrow self-defense exception and require War Powers compliance.
Top coverage · 14 sources