Review of Mandelson's Vetting Process Initiated Amid Controversy
A retired high court judge will assess the vetting process of Peter Mandelson and the national security vetting system. This follows revelations about Mandelson's failed security clearance. (sources: dw, theguardian, nytimes, ft)
Keir Starmer expressed anger over not being informed of Mandelson's failed vetting and has dismissed a senior civil servant. The situation has led to increased scrutiny of the vetting process.
- Adrian Fulford, a retired high court judge, will review Mandelson's vetting process and the national security vetting system.
- Starmer stated it was unforgivable that he was not informed about Mandelson's failed security clearance.
- Mandelson was appointed despite not passing security vetting checks.
Why it matters
The incident raises questions about the security vetting process and accountability within the government.
↓ Why this is on ModernAction
This story is connected to Transparency in Security Clearance Denials Act — legislation your representatives will vote on.
HR4137 · 119th Congress
Transparency in Security Clearance Denials Act
Where do you stand on this bill?
Takes about 60 seconds
About this bill
What HR4137 actually does
This story is about UK Prime Minister Faces Pressure Over Mandelson Vetting Issue. This bill would require an initial and annual report from the Secretary of State on certain adverse security-clearance adjudications.
If passed, it would:
- Require an initial and annual report from the Secretary of State on certain adverse security-clearance adjudications • Give Congress more structured data to spot patterns or process issues in State’s security-clearance pipeline.