James Comey indicted in connection with social media post
James Comey has been indicted by the Department of Justice for a social media post. This marks the second indictment related to Comey. (sources: foxnews, pbs, usatoday, aljazeera, cbsnews)
The Department of Justice has indicted James Comey for a post that allegedly constituted a threat against Trump. This is Comey's second indictment during the Trump administration.
- The indictment is linked to a social media post featuring seashells that spelled out '86 47'.
- This is the second time Comey has faced indictment from the Department of Justice.
- The indictment is part of a broader investigation by the DOJ.
Why it matters
The indictment raises questions about the legal implications of social media communications involving public figures.
↓ Why this is on ModernAction
3 bills on this issue are moving right now — and the most active one is Inspector General Access Act of 2025.
S3307 · 119th Congress
Inspector General Access Act of 2025
Where do you stand on this bill?
Takes about 60 seconds
About this bill
What S3307 actually does
This story is about James Comey indicted again as DOJ probe deepens into ex-FBI chief. This bill would expand/clarify DOJ Inspector General authority over DOJ personnel investigations.
If passed, it would:
- Expand/clarify DOJ Inspector General authority over DOJ personnel investigations • Increase the likelihood that alleged misconduct/abuse inside DOJ can be independently reviewed and reported to Congress.
2 other bills moving on this issue
Take action on any of them individually.
This story is about James Comey being indicted in connection with a social media post. The bill would reauthorize the National Threat Assessment Center through FY2030 and expand its activities to prevent targeted violence, including new prevention programs.
If passed, it would
- Reauthorize NTAC through FY2030 • Expand NTAC activities for targeted violence prevention.
This story is about James Comey indicted again as DOJ probe deepens into ex-FBI chief. This bill would express the House’s condemnation regarding the conduct described in the resolution.
If passed, it would
- Express the House’s condemnation (sense-of-the-House) regarding the conduct described in the resolution • Potentially shape political pressure/oversight attention without changing criminal law.
Top coverage · 13 sources
