Iran and US Exchange Fire in Strait of Hormuz
Iran and the US engaged in a new exchange of fire in the Strait of Hormuz, with both sides blaming each other for initiating the conflict. Trump stated that a ceasefire remains in effect. (sources: france24, ap, irishtimes, independent, bloomberg)
The exchange of fire occurred late Thursday night, raising tensions in the region. Oil prices increased following the incident.
- Iran and the US exchanged fire in the Strait of Hormuz.
- Both countries accused each other of firing first.
- Trump asserted that a ceasefire is still in place.
Why it matters
The incident highlights ongoing tensions between Iran and the US, which could impact regional stability and global oil markets.
↓ Why this is on ModernAction
4 bills on this issue are moving right now — and the most active one is A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress..
SJRES104 · 119th Congress
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
Where do you stand on this bill?
Takes about 60 seconds
About this bill
What SJRES104 actually does
This story is about Iran and the US trade fire over Hormuz, Trump says ceasefire still in effect. This bill would If U.S.-Iran exchanges of fire around the Strait of Hormuz continue or resume, this resolution is a direct lever for Congress to require aut.
If passed, it would:
- Direct the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities “within or against Iran” unless Congress authorizes • Preserve authorities for defense/intelligence/support for partners as described in the resolution text.
3 other bills moving on this issue
Take action on any of them individually.
This story is about What we know about the latest exchange of fire between the US and Iran. This bill would impose sanctions tied to logistical transactions/sanctions evasion involving Iranian oil, gas, LNG.
If passed, it would
- Impose sanctions tied to logistical transactions/sanctions evasion involving Iranian oil, gas, LNG • Expand pressure on networks moving Iranian energy products (including third-party facilitators.
This story is about Iran and the US trade fire over Hormuz, Trump says ceasefire still in effect. This bill would If instability around Hormuz increases pressure to tighten or maintain Iran-related economic constraints, this bill would remove the sunset.
If passed, it would
- Repeal the sunset provision of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 (making those sanctions authorities permanent unless • Reduce the need for recurring reauthorization cycles during future Iran crises.
This story is about Iran and the US trade fire over Hormuz, Trump says ceasefire still in effect. This bill would This is a direct funding/appropriations-style constraint aimed at preventing unauthorized U.S. military force against Iran amid fast-moving.
If passed, it would
- Prohibit the use of funds for military force against Iran absent specific congressional authorization (as described in • Create a clear statutory backstop against expanding hostilities without Congress.
Top coverage · 13 sources