Supreme Court asked to restore mail-order access to abortion pill
A drugmaker has filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court regarding access to the abortion pill by mail. This follows a federal court ruling that paused such access. (sources: cbsnews, washingtonpost, theguardian, reuters, abcnews)
The drugmaker of mifepristone is seeking to restore mail-order access to the abortion pill through an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court. This appeal comes after a recent ruling that imposed restrictions on mail-order access.
- The drugmaker filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court.
- The appeal seeks to restore access to the abortion pill by mail.
- A federal court ruling has paused mail-order access to the abortion pill.
Why it matters
The outcome of this appeal could significantly impact access to abortion medication for individuals who rely on mail delivery.
↓ Why this is on ModernAction
5 bills on this issue are moving right now — and the most active one is Protecting Life from Chemical Abortions Act.
HR1525 · 119th Congress
Protecting Life from Chemical Abortions Act
Where do you stand on this bill?
Takes about 60 seconds
About this bill
What HR1525 actually does
This story is about a drugmaker asking the Supreme Court to restore mail-order access to the abortion pill after a lower court paused that access. This bill would nullify FDA changes to mifepristone dispensing rules and restore in-person dispensing requirements or reverse recent relaxations.
If passed, it would:
- Nullify recent FDA dispensing changes for mifepristone • Restore in-person dispensing requirements for the drug.
4 other bills moving on this issue
Take action on any of them individually.
This story is about a drugmaker asking the Supreme Court to restore mail-order access to the abortion pill after a court paused such access. This bill would bar FDA approval of new pregnancy-terminating drugs and require in-person dispensing and prescription-only distribution for existing drugs.
If passed, it would
- Ban FDA approval of new abortion drugs and restrict labeling • Require in-person administration and prescription-only dispensing.
This story is about Supreme Court asked to restore mail-order access to abortion pill. This bill would remove “means for procuring abortion” language from 18 U.S.C. § 552 and revise related mailing/import provisions.
If passed, it would
- Remove “means for procuring abortion” language from 18 U.S.C. § 552 and revise related mailing/import provisions • Amend the Tariff Act’s related import restriction language (19 U.S.C. § 1305.
This story is about Supreme Court asked to restore mail-order access to abortion pill. This bill would require an in-person exam and in-person presence for medication abortion provision.
If passed, it would
- Require an in-person exam and in-person presence for medication abortion provision • Narrow or eliminate telehealth-plus-mail workflows for abortion pills.
This story is about Supreme Court asked to restore mail-order access to abortion pill. This bill would revise specified federal criminal provisions commonly referred to as “Comstock” restrictions.
If passed, it would
- Revise specified federal criminal provisions commonly referred to as “Comstock” restrictions • Reduce the ability to use those provisions as a basis to restrict mailing abortion medication.
Top coverage · 15 sources