PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding S474: Fair Funding for Rural Hospitals Act

3 min read
The Fair Funding for Rural Hospitals Act, or S474, is a proposed law aimed at ensuring that rural hospitals receive a fair share of Medicaid funding. By setting a minimum funding level for each state, this bill seeks to protect rural healthcare facilities from financial cuts and closures.

What This Bill Does

The Fair Funding for Rural Hospitals Act proposes changes to the way Medicaid funding is distributed to hospitals that serve a high number of low-income patients. Specifically, the bill amends the Social Security Act to establish a minimum Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) allotment for each state. This means that from 2025 to 2029, every state will receive at least $20 million annually, regardless of other calculations or reductions that might have been applied in the past. Starting in 2030, this minimum amount will be adjusted for inflation, ensuring that the funding keeps pace with rising costs. The goal of these changes is to provide a financial safety net for rural hospitals, which often struggle to stay open due to low reimbursements and high numbers of uninsured patients. DSH payments are crucial because they help hospitals that treat a large number of Medicaid and uninsured patients. By setting a minimum funding level, the bill aims to prevent rural hospitals from facing severe financial difficulties that could lead to closures or reduced services.

Why It Matters

Rural hospitals play a vital role in providing healthcare to communities that are often far from urban centers. Without these facilities, residents in rural areas might have to travel long distances to receive medical care, which can be especially challenging in emergencies. By ensuring stable funding, the bill aims to keep these hospitals open and fully operational. The primary beneficiaries of this bill are rural hospitals and the low-income patients they serve. These hospitals often operate on thin margins and rely heavily on DSH payments to provide care. By guaranteeing a minimum level of funding, the bill helps ensure that these facilities can continue to offer essential services like emergency care and primary healthcare. For everyday Americans, especially those living in rural areas, this bill could mean better access to healthcare services without the burden of traveling long distances. It also supports the local economy by preserving healthcare jobs and services that are crucial to community stability.

Key Facts

  • Cost/Budget Impact: The bill would require at least $1 billion annually from 2025 to 2029, with inflation adjustments starting in 2030.
  • Timeline for Implementation: Provisions take effect in fiscal year 2025, starting on October 1, 2025.
  • Number of People Affected: Primarily affects rural hospitals and low-income patients, particularly in states with large rural populations.
  • Key Dates: Introduced on February 6, 2025, and referred to the Senate Finance Committee.
  • Current Status: The bill is in the early stages and has not yet advanced beyond committee review.
  • Historical Context: Rural hospitals have been closing at high rates due to financial pressures, a trend exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Precedents: Similar efforts to support rural hospitals include the Rural Hospital Flexibility Program, which provides grants to sustain critical access hospitals.

Arguments in Support

- Prevents rural hospital closures: By ensuring a stable funding floor, the bill helps keep rural hospitals open, which are often the only healthcare providers in underserved areas. - Improves access to care: The bill ensures that low-income and rural residents have access to necessary medical services without having to travel long distances. - Promotes healthcare equity: By providing a uniform minimum allotment, the bill aims to distribute funds more fairly across states, particularly benefiting smaller and rural states. - Supports community economic stability: Reliable funding helps maintain healthcare jobs and services, which are critical to the economic health of rural communities.

Arguments in Opposition

- Increases federal spending: The bill mandates a minimum of $20 million per state, which could strain Medicaid budgets without identified offsets. - Potential overfunding: The uniform funding approach might lead to overfunding in states with fewer rural hospitals, diverting resources from areas with greater need. - Locks in funds without proven need: Critics argue that existing DSH payments might already be sufficient, and the bill lacks data to justify the minimum funding requirement.
Sources8
Last updated 12/29/2025
  1. co
    congress.gov
  2. qu
    quiverquant.com
  3. go
    govinfo.gov
  4. co
    codifylegalpublishing.com
  5. tr
    trackbill.com
  6. pl
    pluralpolicy.com
  7. le
    legiscan.com
  8. co
    congress.gov

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding S474: Fair Funding for Rural Hospitals Act | ModernAction