PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding S3571: A bill to limit the authority of U.S. Border Patrol personnel to their traditional border security d

3 min read
The "Keeping Our Agents on the Line Act" is a proposed bill that aims to keep U.S. Border Patrol agents focused on their traditional duties at the border. By limiting their roles to border security tasks, the bill seeks to ensure agents aren't pulled away for other duties far from the border.

What This Bill Does

The "Keeping Our Agents on the Line Act" is designed to make sure that U.S. Border Patrol agents stick to their main job: protecting the border. This means they would focus on stopping people from crossing the border illegally, catching smugglers, and supporting border infrastructure. The bill stops agents from being sent more than 100 miles away from the border for other tasks, like immigration enforcement inside the country. Currently, Border Patrol agents can be moved around to help with various tasks, even those not directly related to the border. This bill would change that by making it clear that their job is to stay near the border and focus on border security. It doesn't change the roles of other agencies like Customs and Border Protection or Immigration and Customs Enforcement. By keeping agents at the border, the bill aims to improve efficiency and morale. It addresses concerns that agents are overworked and stretched too thin when they are sent away from the border for other duties. This focus could also help reduce illegal crossings and improve security at the border.

Why It Matters

This bill could have a significant impact on how border security is managed in the U.S. For communities near the border, it might mean more consistent and focused security efforts, potentially reducing illegal crossings and smuggling activities. This could lead to safer communities and less strain on local resources. However, for areas further from the border, this bill might mean less support from Border Patrol agents for immigration enforcement and other tasks. This could put more pressure on other agencies and local law enforcement to handle these duties, possibly leading to gaps in enforcement. For everyday Americans, this bill could mean a shift in how border security is perceived and managed. It highlights the ongoing debate about the best ways to secure the border while balancing the needs and resources of different regions and agencies.

Key Facts

  • Cost/Budget Impact: The bill does not propose new spending and operates within the existing CBP budget.
  • Timeline for Implementation: Provisions would take effect immediately upon enactment.
  • Number of People Affected: Over 20,000 Border Patrol agents could see changes in their duties.
  • Key Dates: Introduced in the 119th Congress, which began in January 2025.
  • No Amendments Proposed: As of now, there are no amendments or changes being discussed for this bill.
  • Real-World Impact: Could affect border communities, migrant groups, and interior law enforcement.
  • Historical Context: Follows post-9/11 expansions of Border Patrol roles, contrasting with recent legislative trends focused on stricter border measures.

Arguments in Support

- Focus on Core Duties: Supporters argue that keeping agents at the border allows them to concentrate on their primary mission, improving effectiveness. - Improves Morale: By reducing non-core tasks, agents may experience less burnout and higher job satisfaction. - Reduces Role Overlap: Clarifying roles between agencies can prevent confusion and improve overall efficiency. - Enhances Security: A concentrated presence at the border could lead to more successful interceptions of illegal activities.

Arguments in Opposition

- Limits Flexibility: Critics say the bill restricts the ability of Border Patrol to respond to national emergencies or crises that require their expertise away from the border. - Drug Crisis Concerns: There are worries that limiting agents to the border could hinder efforts to combat drug trafficking, which often requires interior operations. - Increased Burden on Other Agencies: The bill could shift more responsibilities to already stretched agencies like ICE, potentially creating enforcement gaps. - Potential for Increased Illegal Activity: Some argue that focusing solely on the border could lead to more illegal activities going undetected inland.
Sources7
Last updated 1/27/2026
  1. co
    congress.gov
  2. co
    congress.gov
  3. go
    govinfo.gov
  4. fa
    fastdemocracy.com
  5. co
    congress.gov
  6. co
    congress.gov
  7. co
    congress.gov

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding S3571: A bill to limit the authority of U.S. Border Patrol personnel to their traditional border security d | ModernAction