PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding S2544: GUARD Act

3 min read
The GUARD Act is a proposed law aimed at tackling financial fraud, especially scams targeting the elderly and vulnerable adults. By allowing local law enforcement to use federal funds for advanced tools like blockchain tracing, the bill seeks to protect people from losing their hard-earned savings to fraudsters.

What This Bill Does

The GUARD Act proposes changes to existing federal grant programs, making it easier for state, local, and Tribal law enforcement agencies to use federal funds to fight financial fraud. This includes scams like "pig butchering," where fraudsters build fake relationships to swindle victims out of large sums of money. The bill allows these agencies to use grants for new technologies, such as blockchain tracing tools, to track and catch criminals more effectively. The bill specifically amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. It clarifies that existing grants, like the Byrne Justice Assistance Grant and Community Oriented Policing Services, can be used for investigating financial fraud. This means that law enforcement can now use these funds to buy equipment, improve technology, and work on crime prevention strategies. Additionally, the bill requires annual reports from grantees to federal agencies, detailing how the funds are used and their impact on reducing fraud. Within a year of the bill's enactment, the Treasury Secretary and the Director of FinCEN must report to Congress on the effectiveness of these efforts, including statistics on scam losses and the role of organized crime.

Why It Matters

Financial fraud is a growing problem that affects millions of Americans, especially the elderly and disabled adults. By equipping local law enforcement with better tools and resources, the GUARD Act aims to protect these vulnerable groups from losing their savings to scams. This bill could make online banking and investing safer for seniors, providing them with stronger support and reducing the risk of financial ruin. The bill also promotes better coordination between different levels of law enforcement, which could lead to more effective prevention and quicker recovery of stolen funds. This is important for everyday Americans who might otherwise fall victim to sophisticated scams that are increasingly difficult to trace.

Key Facts

  • Cost/Budget Impact: The bill uses existing federal grant funds without new appropriations, minimizing additional costs.
  • Timeline for Implementation: Provisions take effect immediately upon enactment, with the first Treasury/FinCEN report due within one year.
  • Number of People Affected: Primarily benefits elderly individuals, disabled adults, and scam victims nationwide.
  • Key Dates: Introduced on July 30, 2025; currently in the Senate Judiciary Committee.
  • Bipartisan Sponsorship: Introduced by Sen. Katie Boyd Britt (R-AL) with cosponsors Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Rick Scott (R-FL).
  • Focus on Emerging Technologies: The bill ties grant usage to the 2024 Critical and Emerging Technology List, addressing future fraud threats.
  • Real-World Impact: Aims to prevent billions in annual losses from scams, providing safer financial environments for seniors.

Arguments in Support

- Protects Vulnerable Populations: Supporters argue that the bill will help protect elderly individuals and disabled adults from financial exploitation. - Enhances Law Enforcement Tools: By allowing the use of blockchain tracing, the bill provides law enforcement with advanced tools to detect and investigate fraud. - Promotes Coordination: The bill encourages collaboration between federal, state, and local agencies, which could lead to more effective fraud prevention. - Data-Driven Improvements: Required reports will provide valuable data to refine anti-fraud strategies and policies. - Bipartisan Support: The bill has backing from both Republican and Democratic senators, indicating broad recognition of the issue.

Arguments in Opposition

- Reporting Burden: Critics might argue that the annual reporting requirements could strain the resources of small law enforcement agencies. - Scope Creep: There is concern that broadening the use of grants to include general financial fraud might divert funds from addressing violent crimes. - Privacy Risks: The use of blockchain tools could raise concerns about data privacy and access, despite the bill's limitations on authorized use.
Sources9
Last updated 2/11/2026
  1. co
    congress.gov
  2. co
    congress.gov
  3. co
    congress.gov
  4. bi
    billsponsor.com
  5. co
    congress.gov
  6. tr
    trackbill.com
  7. go
    govinfo.gov
  8. le
    legiscan.com
  9. co
    congress.gov

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding S2544: GUARD Act | ModernAction