PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding S2457: Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2025

2 min read
The Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2025 is a proposed law aiming to strengthen the U.S. government's ability to combat domestic terrorism. It sets up special offices within major federal agencies to focus on threats like White supremacist violence, ensuring that resources are directed toward the most significant dangers without creating new laws.

What This Bill Does

The Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2025 proposes setting up dedicated units within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to focus on domestic terrorism. These units will work together to collect data, report on threats, and coordinate responses. Every six months, these agencies will provide a report to Congress detailing the current domestic terrorism threats, with a particular focus on White supremacist and neo-Nazi activities. The bill also requires these agencies to ensure their investigations respect civil rights and liberties. It emphasizes training for law enforcement and other relevant personnel, ensuring that those involved in countering domestic terrorism have the necessary expertise. Importantly, the bill does not create new crimes or surveillance powers but rather aims to improve the use of existing laws. In addition, the bill encourages better information sharing between federal agencies and local law enforcement, helping to create a more unified approach to tackling domestic terrorism. This means that local police and other law enforcement agencies will have better access to federal resources and information.

Why It Matters

This bill is significant because it addresses the growing concern over domestic terrorism, particularly from groups like White supremacists. By focusing federal resources on these threats, the bill aims to prevent violent acts and protect communities that are often targeted by such groups, including Black, Jewish, Latino, Muslim, immigrant, and LGBTQ+ communities. For everyday Americans, this means potentially safer communities and a more coordinated effort to prevent acts of domestic terrorism. It also aims to ensure that law enforcement agencies are better trained and more accountable, which could lead to more effective and fair policing.

Key Facts

  • Cost/Budget Impact: There is no published CBO cost estimate, but costs are likely related to personnel, data infrastructure, and training.
  • Timeline for Implementation: The first report is due 6 months after enactment, with subsequent reports every 6 months for 10 years.
  • Number of People Affected: The bill impacts federal agencies, law enforcement, and communities at risk of domestic terrorism.
  • Key Dates: The bill requires biannual reports for a 10-year period starting from the date of enactment.
  • Other Important Details: The bill does not create new crimes or surveillance powers but focuses on using existing laws more effectively.

Arguments in Support

- Supporters argue that the bill addresses a documented rise in domestic terrorism, especially from White supremacist groups. - It improves coordination and capacity across DHS, DOJ, and FBI, creating a more unified response to domestic threats. - The bill focuses on data-driven resource allocation, ensuring that the most significant threats receive the most attention. - By emphasizing White supremacist and neo-Nazi violence, the bill targets ideologies linked to large-scale attacks and civil-rights abuses. - It strengthens transparency and congressional oversight, providing regular reports on domestic terrorism trends.

Arguments in Opposition

- Critics worry about the risk of politicization, where enforcement could be biased based on political viewpoints. - There are concerns about civil liberties, as increased data collection might lead to more aggressive investigations. - Some argue that the bill duplicates existing authorities and adds unnecessary bureaucracy. - The focus on specific ideologies might undermine perceptions of neutrality and fairness. - There is a risk of mission creep, where the definition of domestic terrorism could expand over time.
Sources10
Last updated 1/11/2026
  1. co
    congress.gov
  2. co
    congress.gov
  3. wh
    whitehouse.gov
  4. co
    congress.gov
  5. co
    congress.gov
  6. se
    judiciary.senate.gov
  7. tr
    trackbill.com
  8. go
    govtrack.us
  9. le
    legiscan.com
  10. go
    govinfo.gov

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding S2457: Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2025 | ModernAction