PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding S1890: Carla Walker Act

3 min read
The Carla Walker Act, or S1890, is a proposed law aimed at helping solve cold cases by using advanced DNA technology. It sets up a grant program to fund law enforcement agencies so they can use whole genome sequencing to identify suspects and victims in unsolved crimes.

What This Bill Does

The Carla Walker Act introduces a new grant program managed by the Attorney General to help law enforcement agencies use advanced DNA technology. This bill focuses on using whole genome sequencing, which looks at over 100,000 genetic markers, to help solve criminal cases and identify unknown human remains. This technology is more detailed than the current system, CODIS, which uses only 20 markers. The grants are available to states, tribal and local law enforcement, prosecutors' offices with forensic labs, and medical examiners or coroners. These funds can be used for DNA analysis of crime scene evidence or samples from convicted offenders. If CODIS cannot identify a match, the funds can also be used to analyze unidentified homicide victim remains. The bill allows for outsourcing DNA testing to accredited labs, ensuring the results can be used in court. Grantees must report annually on how they use the funding, including the number of cases tested and the outcomes of those tests. The Attorney General will oversee the program, ensuring compliance with Department of Justice policies, and will conduct audits to maintain transparency and accountability.

Why It Matters

This bill could have a significant impact on solving cold cases, bringing closure to families who have been waiting for answers for years. By using advanced DNA technology, law enforcement agencies can identify suspects and victims more quickly, potentially preventing future crimes by catching repeat offenders. The bill also supports under-resourced agencies, providing them with the tools and funding needed to tackle unsolved cases. This could be particularly beneficial for smaller or rural agencies that may not have the resources to conduct such advanced DNA testing on their own.

Key Facts

  • Cost/Budget Impact: The bill authorizes $5 million per year from 2025 to 2029.
  • Timeline for Implementation: Grants would be available immediately upon the bill's passage, with reporting required within one year of receiving funds.
  • Number of People Affected: The bill targets law enforcement agencies, forensic labs, and families of crime victims across the U.S.
  • Key Dates: Introduced on May 22, 2025; requires a congressional report two years post-enactment.
  • Bipartisan Support: Sponsored by Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) and cosponsored by Sen. Peter Welch (D-VT).
  • Advanced Technology: Requires whole genome sequencing, which is more comprehensive than current DNA testing methods.
  • Real-World Precedents: Similar technology helped solve the Golden State Killer case and the Carla Walker case, after whom the bill is named.

Arguments in Support

- Faster Case Resolution: Supporters argue that using whole genome sequencing can speed up the identification process in stalled cases, helping solve crimes faster. - Closure for Families: By identifying unknown victims and perpetrators, the bill can bring closure to families who have been waiting for answers. - Support for Under-Resourced Agencies: The grants provide necessary resources to local and tribal law enforcement agencies, helping them overcome equipment and training gaps. - Accountability and Best Practices: The bill includes strict reporting and auditing requirements to ensure transparency and adherence to best practices. - Cost-Effective Public Safety: With a relatively small budget, the bill aims to leverage existing technology for significant results in solving cold cases.

Arguments in Opposition

- Privacy Concerns: Critics worry about the expanded access to genealogical databases, which could implicate innocent relatives without their consent. - Federal Overreach and Cost: Some argue that the $25 million over five years could be better spent elsewhere and that the competitive grant process may favor larger agencies. - Implementation Challenges: The strict reporting and auditing requirements could be burdensome for smaller agencies. - Risk of False Leads: There is a concern that the technology could produce partial matches, leading to wrongful suspicions. - Equity Issues: Critics point out that the benefits may be skewed towards urban areas, leaving rural and tribal regions at a disadvantage.
Sources9
Last updated 2/6/2026
  1. co
    congress.gov
  2. co
    congress.gov
  3. co
    congress.gov
  4. th
    thecfso.org
  5. le
    legiscan.com
  6. go
    govinfo.gov
  7. le
    legiscan.com
  8. co
    congress.gov
  9. co
    congress.gov

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding S1890: Carla Walker Act | ModernAction