H.Res. 722 is a legislative proposal that sets the stage for funding the U.S. government into fiscal year 2026, while also honoring the legacy of Charles "Charlie" James Kirk. This bill aims to prevent a government shutdown by ensuring federal agencies remain funded and operational, affecting millions of Americans who rely on government services.
What This Bill Does
H.R. 5371, the main focus of H.Res. 722, is a stopgap measure designed to keep the federal government running smoothly into fiscal year 2026. It provides continuing appropriations, which means it extends current funding levels for federal agencies and programs. This ensures that essential services like Social Security, Medicare, and military salaries continue without interruption.
The bill also includes additional funding for the security of federal officials, responding to increased threats in recent years. This means more resources for agencies like the U.S. Capitol Police to protect members of Congress and other federal officials.
Another important aspect of the bill is that it sets a new deadline for Congress to finalize appropriations. Originally set for March 31, 2026, the deadline has been moved up to January 31, 2026. This change is meant to encourage lawmakers to negotiate and pass full-year appropriations sooner, reducing reliance on temporary funding measures.
Finally, the bill includes procedural provisions to streamline its passage through Congress. It limits debate and restricts amendments, which can help expedite the legislative process but also limits opportunities for changes.
Why It Matters
This bill is crucial because it prevents a government shutdown, which can have widespread effects on everyday Americans. When the government shuts down, services like national parks close, tax refunds are delayed, and federal workers may face furloughs. By keeping the government funded, H.R. 5371 ensures that these disruptions are avoided.
For federal employees, this means continued pay and job security. For beneficiaries of social programs like Social Security and Medicare, it means uninterrupted access to benefits. Federal contractors and state and local governments also benefit from the stability this bill provides, as they rely on consistent federal funding for various projects and services.
Additionally, the increased security funding addresses growing concerns about threats to federal officials, which can impact public trust and safety. By allocating more resources for protection, the bill aims to enhance the security of those who serve in government roles.
Key Facts
- Cost/Budget Impact: Continues existing funding levels, with possible increases for security; no CBO score available yet.
- Timeline for Implementation: Provisions take effect at the start of fiscal year 2026 (October 1, 2025), or upon enactment if later.
- Number of People Affected: Impacts over 2 million civilian federal workers, 1.3 million active-duty military personnel, and millions of social program beneficiaries.
- Key Dates: Introduced on September 16, 2025, passed the House on September 19, 2025, and is under Senate consideration as of October 29, 2025.
- Narrow Passage: Passed the House by just five votes, reflecting deep partisan divides.
- Shortened Deadline: The deadline for appropriations action is January 31, 2026, encouraging earlier negotiations.
- Closed Rule: Considered under a closed rule, limiting amendments and streamlining passage.
Arguments in Support
- Prevents Government Shutdown: Ensures federal agencies remain funded and operational, avoiding disruptions to essential services.
- Stability for Federal Programs: Allows programs in health, education, defense, and social services to continue without interruption.
- Additional Security Funding: Provides extra resources for the protection of federal officials, responding to increased threats.
- Time for Negotiations: Gives lawmakers more time to negotiate full-year appropriations and policy changes without risking immediate service disruptions.
- Economic Certainty: Maintains predictable federal spending, stabilizing markets and reassuring contractors and local governments.
Arguments in Opposition
- No Long-Term Solutions: Perpetuates outdated funding levels and priorities, preventing agencies from adapting to new challenges.
- Budgetary Uncertainty: Creates uncertainty for federal agencies, contractors, and grantees, complicating planning and hiring.
- Inefficiency: Seen as a sign of congressional dysfunction and inability to pass regular appropriations bills.
- Potential for Waste: Automatic extensions may fund obsolete or ineffective programs, rather than allowing for targeted reforms.
- Disrupts New Initiatives: New programs or changes requiring fresh appropriations may be delayed or blocked.
