H.Res.26 is a resolution introduced in the 119th Congress that seeks to label certain actions by members of Antifa as domestic terrorism and designate Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization. While this resolution doesn't change any laws, it expresses the opinion of the House of Representatives and calls for action from the Department of Justice.
What This Bill Does
H.Res.26 is a House resolution, which means it is a formal statement of opinion by the House of Representatives rather than a law that can be enforced by courts or government agencies. The resolution was introduced on January 9, 2025, and it has three main points. First, it seeks to label certain actions by members of Antifa as domestic terrorism. This means that the House believes some activities associated with Antifa should be treated as acts of terrorism within the United States.
Second, the resolution aims to designate Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization. This designation would align Antifa with groups that are seen as threats to national security, although it does not carry the legal weight of a formal law. Lastly, the resolution calls on the Department of Justice to prosecute crimes related to Antifa and to use all available resources to combat the spread of Antifa's influence.
It's important to note that this resolution does not change any existing laws. It is a non-binding expression of the House's opinion and does not create new legal tools or mandates for law enforcement. As such, it serves more as a symbolic gesture than a practical change in policy.
Why It Matters
While H.Res.26 does not have the force of law, it reflects ongoing debates about how to handle domestic extremism and protest movements like Antifa. If passed, it could influence how the Department of Justice prioritizes its resources and prosecutions related to domestic terrorism.
For everyday Americans, the resolution might not have a direct impact, but it could affect how protests and activism are perceived and handled by law enforcement. Those affiliated with Antifa or similar movements might face increased scrutiny, even though the resolution itself does not create new legal consequences. The resolution also highlights the political divide in Congress, as it is supported solely by Republican representatives.
Key Facts
- Cost/Budget Impact: There is no cost or budget impact since the resolution is non-binding and does not involve appropriations.
- Timeline for Implementation: There is no timeline for implementation, as the resolution is currently stalled in committee.
- Number of People Affected: No one is directly affected legally, but those affiliated with Antifa might face increased scrutiny.
- Key Dates: Introduced on January 9, 2025, and referred to the House Judiciary Committee on the same day.
- Partisan Nature: Sponsored by five Republican representatives, with no Democratic support.
- Historical Context: Revives debates from 2020 about Antifa's role in protests and domestic extremism.
- Precedents: Similar past efforts to label Antifa as a terrorist group have failed, highlighting the challenges of such designations.
Arguments in Support
- Addressing Violence: Supporters argue that labeling Antifa's actions as terrorism helps address violence associated with protests, such as property damage during the 2020 Portland protests.
- Enhancing Security: By designating Antifa as a terrorist organization, the resolution could prioritize resources for combating domestic extremism.
- Symbolic Stand: The resolution serves as a strong statement against what supporters see as dangerous left-wing extremism.
Arguments in Opposition
- First Amendment Concerns: Critics worry that labeling a loosely organized movement like Antifa as a terrorist group could infringe on free speech and the right to protest.
- Lack of Legal Impact: As a non-binding resolution, it does not create new legal tools, making it more symbolic than practical.
- Partisan Targeting: Opponents argue that the resolution unfairly targets left-leaning activism while ignoring other forms of extremism.