PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding HRES248: Emphasizing the importance and power of distributed ledger technologies (DLT) to support democratic

3 min read
H.Res. 248 is a resolution in the U.S. House of Representatives that highlights the potential of distributed ledger technologies (DLT), like blockchain, to enhance democratic governance, human rights, and transparency. This bill doesn't create new laws but encourages Congress to consider DLT's benefits for society.

What This Bill Does

H.Res. 248 is a non-binding resolution, meaning it doesn't change any laws or allocate funds. Instead, it expresses the opinion of the House of Representatives on the value of distributed ledger technologies (DLT). These technologies, such as blockchain, are known for creating secure and tamper-proof records. The resolution outlines several ways DLT can be beneficial, like improving election integrity by making voting systems more secure and verifiable. The resolution also suggests that DLT can help deliver humanitarian aid more efficiently. For example, by using blockchain, organizations can ensure that aid reaches the intended recipients without being diverted. This technology can also protect human rights by preserving evidence of abuses in a way that can't be altered. Moreover, the bill emphasizes the role of DLT in promoting internet freedom. In countries where governments may try to block or censor information, decentralized networks can help people access information freely. Lastly, the resolution points out that DLT can improve government transparency by allowing citizens to see how public funds are spent in real-time.

Why It Matters

While H.Res. 248 doesn't directly change laws, it signals a growing interest in using technology to solve real-world problems. If Congress takes this resolution seriously, it could lead to more secure voting systems, ensuring that everyone's vote is counted accurately. This could be especially important for Americans living abroad who need to vote absentee. For people in disaster-stricken areas, DLT could mean faster and more reliable delivery of aid. Imagine a world where relief funds are tracked transparently, reducing the chances of corruption and ensuring that help reaches those who need it most. Additionally, the resolution could pave the way for cheaper and more secure financial transactions. This is particularly beneficial for immigrants in the U.S. who send money back home. By reducing transaction fees, families can save more money, which can make a big difference in their daily lives.

Key Facts

  • Cost/budget impact: The resolution has zero cost or budget impact as it doesn't allocate funds.
  • Timeline for implementation: There is no specific timeline since the resolution is non-binding.
  • Number of people affected: While it doesn't directly affect anyone, it could influence policies impacting millions, including the unbanked and those needing aid.
  • Key dates: Introduced on February 6, 2025, and currently stalled in committee.
  • Solo sponsor: The bill is sponsored solely by Rep. Darren Soto, with no cosponsors.
  • Global scope: The resolution references global examples more than domestic ones, highlighting its broad potential impact.
  • DLT breadth: Covers blockchain beyond cryptocurrencies, including its use in government and humanitarian efforts.

Arguments in Support

- Enhances election integrity: DLT can make voting systems more secure and verifiable, reducing the risk of fraud. - Promotes financial inclusion: Digital wallets based on DLT can provide banking access to the unbanked, helping reduce poverty. - Secures humanitarian aid delivery: Immutable ledgers can track aid distribution, preventing diversion and ensuring it reaches those in need. - Protects human rights documentation: DLT can preserve evidence of human rights abuses in a tamper-proof way. - Improves government transparency: Public ledgers can allow citizens to audit government spending in real-time.

Arguments in Opposition

- Energy consumption concerns: Some DLT systems, like Bitcoin, require significant energy, which could be environmentally harmful. - Potential for illicit use: DLT can be used for illegal activities, such as money laundering or tax evasion. - Lack of regulation: The rapid adoption of DLT without proper oversight could lead to unforeseen consequences. - Complexity and accessibility: The technology might be too complex for widespread public understanding and use. - Security risks: While DLT is secure, it is not immune to hacks or other cyber threats.
Sources9
Last updated 2/17/2026
  1. co
    congress.gov
  2. go
    govinfo.gov
  3. co
    congress.gov
  4. co
    congress.gov
  5. co
    congress.gov
  6. le
    legiscan.com
  7. le
    legilist.com
  8. le
    legiscan.com
  9. co
    congress.gov

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding HRES248: Emphasizing the importance and power of distributed ledger technologies (DLT) to support democratic | ModernAction