PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding HR6792: To clarify provisions of the United States Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act and Foreign Tr

3 min read
The Foreign-Trade Zone Export Enhancement Act of 2025, also known as HR6792, aims to clarify how tariffs are applied to goods processed in U.S. foreign-trade zones (FTZs). This bill seeks to ensure that products made in these zones are treated fairly under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), helping businesses avoid unexpected tariff costs.

What This Bill Does

HR6792 is designed to make sure that goods manufactured or processed in U.S. foreign-trade zones receive the correct tariff rates when they are exported or sold within the United States. Currently, there are some confusing overlaps between the rules of the USMCA and the privileges that FTZs enjoy. This can lead to higher tariffs than intended, which can be a burden for businesses operating in these zones. The bill proposes changes to the existing laws to clear up these ambiguities. By doing so, it aligns the operations of FTZs more closely with the preferences outlined in the USMCA for North American supply chains. This means that goods produced in these zones using North American materials can benefit from lower tariffs, making them more competitive in the global market. For example, if a company in a Texas FTZ assembles engines using parts from Mexico, this bill would ensure that these engines are not subject to higher tariffs when exported to Canada. This change is crucial for businesses that rely on cross-border trade and want to keep their costs down.

Why It Matters

This bill is important because it could have a significant impact on the cost of goods and the competitiveness of U.S. exports. By clarifying the tariff rules for FTZs, businesses can avoid unnecessary costs, which can lead to lower prices for consumers. This is particularly relevant in industries like automotive and manufacturing, where even small cost savings can make a big difference. The bill also supports job creation in areas with a high concentration of FTZs. These zones employ over 450,000 workers, and clearer rules could encourage more businesses to expand their operations, potentially creating more jobs. For example, a refinery worker in Texas might see more job security if the company can process Canadian crude more efficiently under the new rules.

Key Facts

  • Cost/Budget Impact: No formal budget estimates are available, but the bill is expected to have a negligible cost as it focuses on regulatory clarifications.
  • Timeline for Implementation: If passed, changes would typically take effect upon enactment or within 90-180 days for Customs adjustments.
  • Number of People Affected: Over 450,000 workers employed in FTZs could be impacted by the bill.
  • Key Dates: The 119th Congress session runs through 2026, but no specific timeline for the bill's advancement is available.
  • Other Important Details: FTZs handle over $1 trillion in goods annually, equivalent to about 10% of the U.S. GDP.
  • Historical Context: FTZs were created in 1934 to boost trade and have grown significantly under agreements like NAFTA and USMCA.
  • Legislative Context: The bill was introduced amid a challenging legislative environment, with only 38 laws enacted from nearly 10,000 introduced bills in the 119th Congress.

Arguments in Support

- Enhances U.S. export competitiveness: By ensuring that FTZ goods qualify for lower USMCA tariffs, the bill reduces costs for exporters using North American inputs. - Reduces administrative burdens and uncertainty: Clarifies the overlap between USMCA and FTZ rules, preventing disputes and delays with Customs and Border Protection. - Supports manufacturing resurgence: Encourages domestic processing in FTZs, addressing supply chain vulnerabilities exposed by recent trade disruptions. - Promotes job creation in trade hubs: Clearer rules could expand FTZ operations, potentially leading to more jobs in areas with high FTZ activity.

Arguments in Opposition

- Risk of tariff evasion or dumping: Critics might argue that the bill allows foreign goods to manipulate origins and undercut U.S. producers, potentially harming domestic industries. - Revenue loss for U.S. Treasury: Lower FTZ tariffs could result in significant duty losses, impacting the national budget. - Unequal benefits favoring multinationals: The bill might primarily benefit large corporations, leaving small businesses at a disadvantage.
Sources9
Last updated 2/17/2026
  1. na
    blog.naiop.org
  2. co
    congress.gov
  3. na
    narhc.org
  4. co
    congress.gov
  5. co
    congress.gov
  6. co
    congress.gov
  7. co
    congress.gov
  8. fa
    fastdemocracy.com
  9. co
    congress.gov

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding HR6792: To clarify provisions of the United States Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act and Foreign Tr | ModernAction