PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding HR6681: To establish the Office of the National Fraud and Scam Prevention, and for other purposes.

3 min read
Imagine a world where you don't have to worry about falling victim to scams every time you answer the phone or open an email. That's the goal of H.R. 6681, a bill that aims to create a new office within the Federal Trade Commission to tackle fraud and scams head-on. This bill seeks to protect consumers and small businesses by coordinating efforts to prevent these deceptive practices.

What This Bill Does

H.R. 6681 proposes the creation of the "Office of the National Fraud and Scam Prevention" within the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). This new office would be responsible for coordinating federal efforts to prevent, detect, and respond to fraud and scams that target individuals and small businesses. The office would be led by a Director appointed by the FTC Chair. The office's main duties would include collecting and analyzing data on fraud trends from various sources, such as FTC complaints, other federal agencies, and private-sector partners. It would also develop educational materials to inform the public about common and emerging scams. These materials would be made available in plain language and accessible formats to ensure everyone can understand them. Additionally, the office would work closely with state attorneys general, federal law enforcement, and community organizations to share data and best practices. It would focus on outreach to vulnerable populations, such as older adults and limited English speakers, who are often targeted by scammers. The office would also be tasked with issuing guidance and recommendations to help prevent scams, all within the existing authority of the FTC.

Why It Matters

Fraud and scams are a growing problem, with millions of reports and billions of dollars lost each year. This bill aims to centralize efforts to combat these issues, making it easier for consumers to get the help they need. By focusing on prevention and education, the bill hopes to reduce the number of people falling victim to scams. Everyday Americans, especially those in vulnerable groups, stand to benefit from this bill. Older adults, who often face tech support and government impersonation scams, would receive targeted resources to help protect them. Small businesses, which can be devastated by scams, would also receive guidance and support to prevent fraudulent activities.

Key Facts

  • Cost/Budget Impact: The bill authorizes appropriations for the office, but exact amounts are not specified.
  • Timeline for Implementation: The office would be established upon enactment, with a Director appointed shortly after.
  • Number of People Affected: Potentially millions of consumers and small businesses nationwide could benefit from increased protection.
  • Key Dates: Introduced in the House on December 11, 2025, and referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
  • No CBO Score: As of now, there is no Congressional Budget Office cost estimate available.
  • Coordination with Other Entities: The office would work with state and federal agencies, community organizations, and industry stakeholders.
  • Focus on Vulnerable Populations: Emphasis on outreach to older adults, limited English speakers, and low-income communities.

Arguments in Support

- Centralized Efforts: Supporters argue that a dedicated office would streamline anti-fraud efforts, reducing duplication and gaps in current systems. - Focus on Prevention: By emphasizing prevention and education, the bill aims to stop scams before they happen, potentially saving billions in losses. - Protection for Vulnerable Groups: The bill targets outreach to older adults, limited English speakers, and small businesses, who are often more susceptible to scams. - Improved Data Collection: The office would aggregate data from various sources to spot emerging scam patterns faster, enabling more effective responses. - Cost-Effective: Supporters believe that the cost of the office is small compared to the potential savings from reduced fraud losses.

Arguments in Opposition

- Duplication of Efforts: Critics argue that the FTC already has units targeting scams, and a new office could be redundant. - Government Growth: Some worry about the creation of a new bureaucracy with ongoing costs and potential for budget expansion. - Unclear Success Metrics: Opponents point out the lack of specific performance metrics, making it hard to measure the office's effectiveness. - Overlapping Jurisdictions: With many agencies already issuing fraud guidance, a new office might confuse the public about where to report scams. - Focus on Symptoms, Not Causes: Critics argue that the bill does not address root causes like weak identity verification standards.
Sources6
Last updated 1/11/2026
  1. co
    congress.gov
  2. co
    congress.gov
  3. co
    congress.gov
  4. pl
    open.pluralpolicy.com
  5. co
    congress.gov
  6. co
    congress.gov

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding HR6681: To establish the Office of the National Fraud and Scam Prevention, and for other purposes. | ModernAction