PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding HR6341: Partnerships for Agricultural Climate Action Act

3 min read
The Partnerships for Agricultural Climate Action Act, known as H.R. 6341, is a proposed law aiming to help farmers adapt to climate change. By providing grants to various agricultural entities, the bill seeks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and boost resilience against extreme weather events.

What This Bill Does

H.R. 6341 proposes the creation of a grant program managed by the Secretary of Agriculture. This program is designed to help farmers and agricultural organizations develop and implement strategies to adapt to climate change and reduce their carbon footprint. The bill targets a wide range of eligible entities, including state agriculture departments, Tribal Governments, farmer cooperatives, and educational institutions. To participate, these entities must submit proposals that outline their plans for climate adaptation and mitigation. The proposals are evaluated based on their potential to store carbon, enhance resilience, and include historically underserved groups such as beginning farmers, socially disadvantaged producers, and veterans. The bill also encourages the use of traditional ecological knowledge, especially in partnerships with Tribal Governments. Funding for these initiatives is set at $150 million annually from 2026 to 2034. The funds are divided among different activities, with at least one-third allocated to proposal development, implementation, and grants specifically for Tribal Governments. The bill sets limits on grant amounts, with up to $7.5 million available for development projects and $15 million for implementation projects.

Why It Matters

This bill is significant because it addresses the challenges farmers face due to climate change, such as extreme weather events that can devastate crops and livestock. By supporting climate adaptation and mitigation strategies, the bill aims to make farms more resilient, potentially stabilizing food prices and supply. This is crucial for both rural communities, who rely on agriculture for their livelihoods, and urban consumers, who benefit from stable food costs. The bill also prioritizes historically underserved groups, which can help address longstanding inequities in agriculture. These groups often have less access to resources and face higher risks of failure, so targeted support could improve their success rates and contribute to a more equitable agricultural sector.

Key Facts

  • Cost/Budget Impact: $150 million annually from 2026 to 2034, totaling approximately $1.35 billion.
  • Timeline for Implementation: Funding starts in fiscal year 2026, with program duration until 2034.
  • Number of People Affected: Benefits agricultural entities nationwide, with an emphasis on historically underserved farmers.
  • Key Dates: Introduced in the House on December 1, 2025; funding begins October 1, 2025.
  • Massive Grants: Up to $15 million per project, enough to equip 1,000 farms with carbon-sequestering technology.
  • Tribal Priority: 33% of funds reserved for Tribal Governments, integrating indigenous knowledge.
  • No Lobbying Yet: Unusual for agricultural and climate-related bills, which often attract significant lobbying activity.

Arguments in Support

- Enhances Resilience: The bill funds strategies to help farms withstand extreme weather, potentially reducing the $2.4 billion annual cost of climate-related agricultural losses. - Reduces Emissions: By supporting carbon sequestration projects, the bill aims to cut the agricultural sector's greenhouse gas emissions, which account for 10-11% of the U.S. total. - Supports Underserved Groups: Prioritizes funding for beginning, socially disadvantaged, and veteran farmers, promoting equity in agriculture. - Encourages Collaboration: Fosters partnerships between states and Tribal Governments, leveraging traditional ecological knowledge for innovative solutions. - Boosts Economic Innovation: Large grants could drive technological advancements in sustainable agriculture, benefiting companies in the biotech and chemical industries.

Arguments in Opposition

- High Cost: The $1.35 billion total cost over nine years may strain federal budgets without guaranteed returns on investment. - Risk of Inefficiency: Large grants to nonprofits and cooperatives could lead to oversight challenges and potential waste. - Potential Favoritism: The 33% set-aside for Tribal Governments might disadvantage non-Tribal farmers, who make up the majority of U.S. producers. - Corporate Influence: Ties to large agricultural firms could be perceived as subsidizing industry shifts rather than directly aiding farmers. - Administrative Burden: Performance reporting requirements might impose additional burdens on small entities.
Sources9
Last updated 1/14/2026
  1. co
    congress.gov
  2. co
    congress.gov
  3. qu
    quiverquant.com
  4. co
    congress.gov
  5. tr
    trackbill.com
  6. go
    govinfo.gov
  7. go
    govinfo.gov
  8. fa
    fastdemocracy.com
  9. go
    govtrack.us

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding HR6341: Partnerships for Agricultural Climate Action Act | ModernAction