PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding HR6334: Deepfake Liability Act

3 min read
Imagine a world where your online safety is taken more seriously. The Deepfake Liability Act, a new bill introduced in Congress, aims to hold online platforms accountable for harmful deepfakes and cyberstalking. This legislation seeks to protect individuals from the misuse of technology that can create fake, damaging content.

What This Bill Does

The Deepfake Liability Act is designed to amend existing laws to better protect people from harmful digital content. It specifically targets online platforms like social media sites, requiring them to take more responsibility for the content users post. The bill introduces a "duty of care" for these platforms, meaning they must have systems in place to prevent and address cyberstalking and the sharing of intimate images without consent. This includes having user reporting mechanisms and ensuring that harmful content is removed quickly, within 48 hours of a valid report. Another significant part of the bill is its focus on deepfakes, which are digitally altered images or videos that can make it look like someone is doing or saying something they never did. The bill prohibits the creation and sharing of sexually explicit deepfakes without the person's consent. This builds on existing laws that already address the sharing of real intimate images without consent. The bill also provides some protections for platforms that act in good faith to remove harmful content. This means that if a platform makes a reasonable effort to comply with the law, it may not be held liable for every piece of harmful content that slips through. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is tasked with creating rules to help implement these changes, ensuring that the new provisions are applied fairly and do not infringe on free speech rights.

Why It Matters

This bill could have a significant impact on the lives of everyday Americans by offering more protection against the misuse of digital technology. Victims of deepfake pornography and cyberstalking, who are often women and teens, would benefit from quicker removal of harmful content and more robust reporting tools. This could help reduce the emotional distress and reputational damage caused by such violations. For online platforms, the bill means taking on more responsibility for the content they host. While this could lead to increased costs for compliance, it also encourages platforms to develop better systems for identifying and removing harmful content. This shift could lead to a safer online environment for all users, where privacy and dignity are better protected.

Key Facts

  • Cost/Budget Impact: No direct appropriations; relies on existing FTC authority and private compliance.
  • Timeline for Implementation: Provisions apply to content posted after enactment; FTC to issue regulations.
  • Number of People Affected: Primarily impacts online platforms, victims of digital abuse, and general internet users.
  • Key Dates: Introduced on December 1, 2025; currently in early stages with low likelihood of passage without further support.
  • Zero Lobbying: Unusual for a Section 230 bill, no reported corporate lobbying as of now.
  • Minimal Support: Only two sponsors, indicating a niche focus.
  • Historical Context: Deepfakes have become a growing concern since 2017, with a surge in non-consensual explicit content prompting legislative action.

Arguments in Support

- Protects Victims: The bill aims to protect individuals from the emotional and reputational harm caused by non-consensual deepfakes and intimate image sharing. - Improves Accountability: By requiring platforms to have clear reporting processes and data logs, the bill enhances accountability and ensures quicker action against harmful content. - Addresses Cyberstalking: The bill targets the real-world harms of cyberstalking, which can lead to mental health issues for victims. - Builds on Existing Laws: It extends the protections of the TAKE IT DOWN Act to cover deepfakes, ensuring a more comprehensive approach to digital privacy. - Standardizes Legal Protections: Establishes a federal standard for deepfake regulation, preventing inconsistent enforcement across states.

Arguments in Opposition

- Threatens Free Speech: Critics argue that creating exceptions to Section 230 could lead to over-removal of legitimate content, chilling free speech online. - High Compliance Costs: Smaller platforms may struggle with the costs of implementing the required changes, potentially leading to increased fees for users. - Vague Definitions: Terms like "reasonable process" might be interpreted in ways that suppress legitimate content, such as satire or political commentary. - Government Overreach: Some fear that FTC regulations could expand beyond the intended scope, leading to broader censorship concerns. - Limited Enforcement: The bill relies on private lawsuits for enforcement, which may disadvantage everyday users who lack resources.
Sources10
Last updated 1/6/2026
  1. qu
    quiverquant.com
  2. co
    congress.gov
  3. co
    congress.gov
  4. go
    govtrack.us
  5. co
    congress.gov
  6. co
    congress.gov
  7. go
    govinfo.gov
  8. go
    govinfo.gov
  9. ta
    targetednews.com
  10. co
    congress.gov

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding HR6334: Deepfake Liability Act | ModernAction