The Federal-State Partnership for Clean Water Act of 2025, also known as H.R. 5445, aims to enhance the quality of water across the United States by increasing funding for clean water programs. This bill seeks to strengthen the collaboration between federal, state, and local agencies to protect and restore vital water resources like wetlands.
What This Bill Does
H.R. 5445 proposes significant changes to the existing Federal Water Pollution Control Act, commonly referred to as the Clean Water Act. One of the key changes is the increase in funding for wetlands programs. The bill raises the annual appropriations from $75 million to $300 million for the years 2026 to 2030. Out of this amount, at least $100 million each year is designated for state, interstate, and municipal programs focused on protecting, managing, or restoring wetlands.
Another important aspect of the bill is the boost in financial support for state clean water program management. It authorizes $500 million annually from 2026 to 2030 to help states manage their clean water programs effectively. This funding is intended to address any financial shortfalls that have been identified from 1991 to 2025, ensuring that states have the resources they need to control pollution and comply with regulations.
The bill also emphasizes the importance of cooperation between federal, state, and local agencies, encouraging participation by local and tribal entities in clean water initiatives. This collaborative approach aims to enhance the efficiency of water quality efforts without imposing new regulatory mandates.
Why It Matters
Clean water is essential for everyday life, and this bill could have a significant impact on the quality of water that Americans rely on. By increasing funding for wetlands protection and state management, the bill aims to address issues like wetland loss, which affects water filtration and flood control. This is particularly important for areas prone to flooding, such as Louisiana's coast, where restored wetlands can help mitigate flood damage.
The bill also benefits states facing specific water quality challenges. For example, states like Florida, which struggle with algal blooms caused by nutrient runoff, could use the additional funding to improve monitoring and management efforts. This could lead to cleaner rivers and lakes, benefiting not just the environment but also the people who rely on these water sources for drinking, farming, and recreation.
Key Facts
- Cost/Budget Impact: The bill authorizes approximately $4 billion over five years, with no specified funding sources or offsets.
- Timeline for Implementation: Funding increases are set for fiscal years 2026-2030, starting October 1, 2025.
- Number of People Affected: Residents in water-stressed areas, such as Midwest farmers and coastal communities, stand to benefit.
- Key Dates: The bill was introduced on September 17, 2025, and referred to committee the following day.
- Other Important Details: The bill covers funding gaps back to 1991 and has no reported corporate lobbying, which is unusual for environmental legislation.
Arguments in Support
- Enhanced Wetlands Protection: The bill quadruples funding for wetlands, addressing significant wetland loss and helping to restore vital ecosystems.
- Strengthened State Management: By providing $500 million annually, the bill helps states fill historical funding gaps and improve pollution control measures.
- Federal-State Partnership Efficiency: Encouraging collaboration with local and tribal entities reduces federal overreach and scales up successful programs.
- Economic Benefits: The bill could create jobs in environmental services and water technology sectors, boosting the economy.
- Long-Term Water Security: Sustained funding through 2030 ensures continuous support for clean water programs, preventing potential water crises.
Arguments in Opposition
- High Federal Spending: The bill adds over $800 million annually, which could strain the federal budget amid a growing national debt.
- Risk of Inefficient Allocation: The mandated minimum funding for wetlands might divert resources from other critical needs, like urban drinking water infrastructure.
- Impacts on Industries: Energy companies near wetlands might face increased compliance costs due to expanded protections.
- Lack of New Accountability: Without new performance metrics, the bill risks repeating past implementation delays and inefficiencies.
