PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding HR5061: Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act

3 min read
The Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, or H.R. 5061, is a proposed law aimed at improving how the U.S. handles drone threats. By giving more power to federal agencies like the FAA and DHS, this bill seeks to protect airports and critical infrastructure from potential drone-related dangers.

What This Bill Does

H.R. 5061 is all about making sure drones don't become a problem for airports and other important places. The bill gives the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) the power to use special technology to find and stop drones that might cause trouble. This means they can set up systems to detect and deal with drones at major airports and other critical sites. The bill also requires the FAA to put these detection systems in place at big and medium-sized airports, as well as some cargo airports, within certain time limits. Meanwhile, the DHS can try out these systems at up to five airports to see how well they work, with some tests involving local police. To make sure everything runs smoothly, the bill sets standards for training the people who will operate these systems. It also requires drone makers to give users information about the rules and restrictions they need to follow. Plus, the bill ensures that different government agencies work together better and that Congress keeps an eye on how things are going.

Why It Matters

This bill is important because it addresses the growing issue of drones flying where they shouldn't be, which can be dangerous. For example, if a drone gets too close to an airport, it could cause problems for planes taking off or landing. By improving how we detect and manage these drones, the bill aims to keep passengers and pilots safe. The bill also matters for big events like the FIFA World Cup and the 2028 Summer Olympics. These events attract large crowds, and drones could pose a security risk. By giving law enforcement the tools they need to handle drones, the bill helps ensure these events can go on safely. For everyday Americans, this means safer skies and more secure public spaces. It also means clearer rules for people who fly drones as a hobby or for work, helping them avoid accidentally breaking the law.

Key Facts

  • Cost/Budget Impact: The bill's financial details are not specified, leaving questions about its budgetary implications.
  • Timeline for Implementation: The bill's provisions are set to expire on October 1, 2030, unless reauthorized.
  • Number of People Affected: The bill impacts airports, law enforcement, drone manufacturers, and the general public.
  • Key Dates: Passed committee on September 3, 2025, with unanimous support.
  • International Compliance: Actions under the bill must align with international obligations.
  • Training Standards: Establishes standards for training and qualifications for those operating counter-drone systems.
  • Pilot Program: Introduces the first formal pilot program for local law enforcement to use counter-drone technology.

Arguments in Support

- Addresses security threats: Supporters say the bill is necessary because drone incidents are becoming more common and dangerous. - Protects public events: The bill helps secure major events like the World Cup and Olympics from potential drone threats. - Improves safety: By detecting drones near airports, the bill aims to prevent accidents and protect passengers. - Bipartisan support: The bill passed with unanimous support in committee, showing agreement across political lines. - Ensures oversight: The bill includes measures for regular updates to Congress, promoting transparency and accountability.

Arguments in Opposition

- Privacy concerns: Critics worry that increased surveillance could infringe on personal privacy. - Effectiveness questions: Some argue that the technology may not be effective enough to justify the cost and effort. - Civil liberties: There are concerns about the potential for misuse of power and impact on civil liberties. - Cost implications: Opponents may question the financial impact and whether funds could be better spent elsewhere.
Sources10
Last updated 2/11/2026
  1. le
    legiscan.com
  2. co
    congress.gov
  3. co
    congress.gov
  4. co
    congress.gov
  5. qu
    quiverquant.com
  6. ho
    transportation.house.gov
  7. tr
    trackbill.com
  8. aa
    alerts.aaae.org
  9. go
    govinfo.gov
  10. ho
    docs.house.gov

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding HR5061: Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act | ModernAction