PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding HR4413: End the Cyprus Embargo Act

3 min read
The End the Cyprus Embargo Act, known as H.R. 4413, aims to lift a long-standing ban on defense exports to Cyprus. This bill seeks to update outdated policies and strengthen ties between the U.S. and Cyprus, potentially impacting regional stability and defense industries.

What This Bill Does

H.R. 4413 is a proposed law that would change how the United States deals with Cyprus regarding defense exports. For many years, the U.S. has not allowed the sale of defense items to Cyprus because of its proximity to Turkey and historical tensions in the region. This bill wants to end that embargo, which has been in place since 1987. The main idea of the bill is to stop the policy that denies Cyprus the ability to buy defense items from the U.S. This means that Cyprus could start purchasing things like patrol boats and radars from American companies. The bill is straightforward and doesn't add any extra conditions, like needing to meet human rights standards, which are often required in other arms deals. By lifting the embargo, the bill would allow Cyprus to strengthen its military capabilities. This change could also open up new markets for U.S. defense companies, potentially boosting the economy by creating more jobs in the defense sector.

Why It Matters

This bill could have significant implications for various groups. For Cyprus, it means access to better defense equipment, which could help the country protect itself and play a more active role in regional security. This could also reduce Cyprus's reliance on other countries, like Russia, for military supplies. For the U.S., the bill could mean increased sales for American defense companies, potentially creating jobs and boosting the economy. It also aligns with U.S. strategic interests in the Eastern Mediterranean, where tensions with Russia and Turkey are ongoing. However, there are concerns about how this might affect relations with Turkey, a NATO ally. If Turkey sees this as a threat, it could lead to diplomatic tensions or even impact U.S. military operations in the region.

Key Facts

  • Cost/Budget Impact: No direct cost to the U.S.; potential economic benefits from increased exports.
  • Timeline for Implementation: Would take effect immediately upon signing into law.
  • Number of People Affected: Impacts Cyprus's military, U.S. defense industry workers, and potentially regional diplomatic relations.
  • Key Dates: Introduced on July 15, 2025; currently in the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
  • Other Important Details: The bill is short, with only seven sections, and currently has no cosponsors, indicating low momentum.
  • Historical Context: The embargo was initially imposed after Turkey's 1974 invasion of Cyprus, and lifting it reflects changing geopolitical dynamics.
  • Potential Precedents: Similar embargo lifts have occurred, such as the U.S. ending its embargo on Vietnam in 1994, leading to significant economic benefits.

Arguments in Support

- Modernizes Policy: Updates a Cold War-era policy to reflect current geopolitical realities and Cyprus's alignment with EU and NATO interests. - Strengthens Defense: Allows Cyprus to purchase U.S. arms, enhancing its defense capabilities and reducing reliance on Russian equipment. - Boosts U.S. Exports: Opens a new market for American defense companies, potentially creating jobs and economic growth. - Promotes Stability: A stronger Cyprus could deter aggression in the region, supporting U.S. goals in the energy-rich Eastern Mediterranean. - Rewards Reforms: Recognizes Cyprus's efforts in passing anti-corruption laws and improving procurement processes.

Arguments in Opposition

- Escalates Tensions with Turkey: Could strain relations with Turkey, a key NATO ally, and lead to regional conflicts. - Reduces Leverage: The embargo has been a tool for encouraging reunification talks between Greek and Turkish Cypriots. - Security Concerns: Cyprus's military is untested in battle, raising concerns about the security of U.S. arms. - Lacks Oversight: The bill does not include provisions for monitoring how the arms are used or ensuring human rights compliance. - Financial Burden: Potential costs associated with Foreign Military Sales financing could strain U.S. aid budgets.
Sources8
Last updated 1/14/2026
  1. co
    congress.gov
  2. ho
    docs.house.gov
  3. co
    congress.gov
  4. co
    codifylegalpublishing.com
  5. le
    legiscan.com
  6. pl
    open.pluralpolicy.com
  7. go
    govinfo.gov
  8. co
    congress.gov

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding HR4413: End the Cyprus Embargo Act | ModernAction