PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding HR390: ACERO Act

3 min read
The ACERO Act, or H.R. 390, is a proposed law aimed at enhancing how the United States responds to wildfires using advanced technology. By empowering NASA to develop and deploy uncrewed aircraft systems, this bill seeks to improve the coordination and effectiveness of aerial firefighting efforts.

What This Bill Does

The ACERO Act gives NASA the authority to lead a project focused on improving how we respond to wildfires from the air. It directs NASA to work on developing and using drones and other advanced aviation technologies to help fight wildfires more effectively. This means creating better ways to manage the airspace during emergencies, ensuring that all the different teams involved in fighting a fire can share information in real-time. A significant part of the bill is the $15 million funding it authorizes for 2026, which will be used to support these efforts. The bill also requires NASA to report back to Congress every year until 2030, keeping lawmakers informed about the project's progress. Additionally, it restricts NASA from buying drones from certain foreign countries, like China, unless it's absolutely necessary and in the national interest, with Congress being notified 30 days in advance. The bill also pushes for a coordinated approach involving multiple agencies at the federal, state, and local levels. This means that different government bodies will work together more closely, sharing information and resources to tackle wildfires more effectively.

Why It Matters

Wildfires have become more frequent and severe, posing a significant threat to communities, wildlife, and the environment. This bill aims to address these challenges by improving how we respond to such emergencies. By using advanced technology, the ACERO Act could make firefighting efforts faster and more efficient, potentially saving lives and reducing property damage. Communities in wildfire-prone areas, especially in western states like California and Oregon, stand to benefit the most. The bill's focus on better coordination and technology means that emergency responders can work more safely and effectively, reducing the risks they face on the job. For everyday Americans, this could mean quicker evacuations and better protection of homes and natural resources.

Key Facts

  • Cost/Budget Impact: The bill authorizes $15 million for fiscal year 2026.
  • Implementation Timeline: Annual reporting is required through December 31, 2030, but no specific operational deadlines are set.
  • Affected Parties: Federal agencies like NASA, state and local governments, emergency responders, and aerospace companies are all impacted.
  • Key Dates: Introduced on January 14, 2025, and reported by the House Committee on June 11, 2025.
  • Committee Support: The bill received unanimous support (34-0) from the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
  • Domestic Focus: The bill promotes the use of American-made drones and technologies.
  • Wildfire Impact: Primarily benefits regions in the western U.S. that are prone to frequent and severe wildfires.

Arguments in Support

- Improves Wildfire Response: Supporters argue that the bill addresses critical gaps in how we currently fight wildfires, making operations safer and more efficient. - Utilizes Existing Expertise: By leveraging NASA's existing technology, the bill avoids unnecessary spending and maximizes past investments. - Encourages Domestic Innovation: The restriction on foreign-made drones promotes the development of American technology, supporting local industries. - Enhances Public Safety: Better coordination and technology could lead to fewer accidents and more effective firefighting efforts, protecting both responders and civilians. - Accountability and Oversight: Annual reports to Congress ensure transparency and allow for adjustments if the project doesn't meet expectations.

Arguments in Opposition

- Foreign Technology Restrictions: Critics worry that the ban on certain foreign technologies could limit access to the best tools available, potentially increasing costs. - Coordination Challenges: Bringing together multiple agencies with different systems and protocols could be complex and difficult to manage effectively. - Funding Concerns: Some argue that $15 million might not be enough to achieve the bill's ambitious goals, potentially limiting its impact. - Uncertain Timelines: The bill lacks specific deadlines for when the new systems should be operational, which could delay real-world benefits.
Sources9
Last updated 2/21/2026
  1. co
    congress.gov
  2. ho
    science.house.gov
  3. ho
    docs.house.gov
  4. ho
    republicans-science.house.gov
  5. co
    congress.gov
  6. co
    congress.gov
  7. co
    congress.gov
  8. cb
    cbo.gov
  9. co
    congress.gov

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding HR390: ACERO Act | ModernAction