PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding HR3198: Intergovernmental Critical Minerals Task Force Act

3 min read
The Intergovernmental Critical Minerals Task Force Act, or H.R. 3198, is a proposed law aiming to reduce the United States' reliance on foreign countries for critical minerals. These minerals are essential for producing everyday items like smartphones and electric vehicles. The bill seeks to establish a task force that will help secure domestic supply chains and promote environmentally responsible mining practices.

What This Bill Does

H.R. 3198 proposes to create an Intergovernmental Critical Minerals Task Force. This task force will assess the United States' dependence on countries like China for critical minerals. These minerals are crucial for manufacturing technology and defense equipment. The task force will provide recommendations to the President on how to reduce this reliance and secure the country's supply chains. The bill requires the President to appoint a Chairperson or two Co-Chairpersons for the task force within 90 days of the bill becoming law. These leaders will then select representatives from at least 24 federal agencies, such as the Department of Defense and the U.S. Geological Survey. They will also consult with state, local, and Tribal experts, as well as private sector stakeholders. The task force's duties include developing recommendations to increase the United States' capacity for mining and processing critical minerals in an environmentally friendly way. They will also look into changing laws and regulations to speed up domestic production and identify alternatives to foreign mineral sources. The task force will work to integrate existing recommendations from the National Science and Technology Council and prioritize actions based on economic and national security risks.

Why It Matters

Critical minerals are essential components in many products that Americans use daily, such as smartphones, electric vehicles, and wind turbines. By reducing reliance on foreign sources, the bill aims to prevent potential supply disruptions that could lead to price spikes or shortages. This could help stabilize prices for consumers and ensure that production continues smoothly. The bill could also create jobs in the mining and processing industries, particularly in states rich in minerals like Nevada and California. By promoting environmentally responsible mining practices, the bill seeks to address past environmental issues associated with mining activities. This could benefit local communities and protect natural resources.

Key Facts

  • Cost/Budget Impact: No specific budget is allocated; the task force will rely on existing agency resources.
  • Timeline for Implementation: The President must appoint a Chairperson within 90 days of the bill's enactment.
  • Number of People Affected: The bill could impact industries like mining, processing, and recycling, as well as federal agencies and local communities.
  • Key Dates: Introduced on May 5, 2025; no further actions have been recorded.
  • Bipartisan Support: The bill has bipartisan backing, with a Republican sponsor and a Democratic cosponsor.
  • Environmental Focus: Emphasizes environmentally responsible mining practices through consultations with Tribal and local communities.
  • International Context: Aligns with global efforts to secure critical mineral supply chains amid geopolitical tensions.

Arguments in Support

- Reduces national security risks: By decreasing reliance on foreign countries for critical minerals, the U.S. can avoid supply disruptions and strengthen its national security. - Secures domestic supply chains: The bill encourages onshoring of mining and processing activities, potentially creating jobs and boosting local economies. - Promotes environmental responsibility: The task force will prioritize environmentally friendly mining practices, consulting with Tribal and local communities. - Enhances intergovernmental coordination: Involving multiple federal agencies and stakeholders can lead to more cohesive and effective strategies. - Strengthens international alliances: The bill encourages collaboration with allies to develop advanced mining and refining technologies.

Arguments in Opposition

- Creates redundant bureaucracy: Critics argue that the task force may overlap with existing bodies, leading to inefficiencies. - Unfunded mandate: The bill does not provide additional funding, which could strain already stretched federal agencies. - Limited impact: As an advisory body, the task force can only make recommendations, which may not lead to concrete actions. - Consultation burdens: Extensive consultations with various stakeholders could delay decision-making processes. - Geopolitical overreach: The broad definition of "covered countries" could escalate trade tensions without clear benefits.
Sources8
Last updated 1/12/2026
  1. co
    congress.gov
  2. co
    congress.gov
  3. co
    congress.gov
  4. go
    govinfo.gov
  5. tr
    trackbill.com
  6. go
    govinfo.gov
  7. le
    legiscan.com
  8. co
    congress.gov

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding HR3198: Intergovernmental Critical Minerals Task Force Act | ModernAction