PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding HR298: To eliminate certain limitations and exclusions regarding defense articles and requirements regardin

2 min read
H.R. 298 is a proposed bill that aims to change the way the United States interacts with Cyprus regarding military equipment and support. By lifting certain restrictions, this bill could open the door for more straightforward defense cooperation between the two countries.

What This Bill Does

H.R. 298 is focused on changing existing U.S. laws that currently limit the sale and assistance of defense articles to Cyprus. These restrictions were put in place to prevent military equipment from being misused or falling into the wrong hands. The bill proposes to remove these limitations, allowing Cyprus to purchase defense equipment from the U.S. without needing special approval from Congress. The bill specifically targets two major laws: the Arms Export Control Act and the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. By amending these laws, the bill would eliminate the need for Cyprus to undergo a rigorous certification process before acquiring U.S. military equipment. This means that once the bill is enacted, Cyprus could engage in defense transactions with the U.S. more freely, similar to other allies. The changes would take effect immediately upon the bill's enactment, meaning that Cyprus could start benefiting from these new provisions right away. This move is seen as a step towards modernizing the defense relationship between the U.S. and Cyprus, aligning it more closely with other European Union and NATO members.

Why It Matters

The bill could have significant implications for Cyprus, the U.S., and the broader Eastern Mediterranean region. For Cyprus, gaining easier access to U.S. defense articles could enhance its military capabilities and contribute to regional stability. This is particularly important given Cyprus's strategic location and ongoing tensions in the area. For the U.S., this bill could strengthen ties with Cyprus, a key partner in the region, and support broader geopolitical goals. It could also benefit the U.S. defense industry by opening up new markets for American defense companies. However, for everyday Americans, the impact may not be directly felt. The bill primarily affects foreign policy and international relations, with limited immediate consequences for domestic issues like jobs or taxes.

Key Facts

  • Cost/Budget Impact: No direct appropriations or budget estimates are available; the bill focuses on regulatory changes.
  • Timeline for Implementation: Provisions take effect immediately upon enactment.
  • Number of People Affected: Primarily impacts the Cyprus government and military, with potential effects on U.S. defense companies.
  • Key Dates: Introduced on January 9, 2025; no further actions recorded.
  • Historical Context: Restrictions date back to the 1980s, following Cyprus's division after the 1974 Turkish invasion.
  • Precedents: Similar legislative efforts have been made in the past, such as the 2022 EastMed Act.
  • Sponsor: Introduced by Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, representing a district with a significant Greek-American population.

Arguments in Support

- Strengthening Alliances: Supporters argue that the bill will bolster U.S.-Cyprus relations, aligning Cyprus more closely with NATO and EU partners. - Regional Stability: By enhancing Cyprus's defense capabilities, the bill could contribute to stability in the Eastern Mediterranean, a region with ongoing tensions. - Economic Opportunities: The U.S. defense industry could benefit from new sales opportunities, potentially boosting economic activity in this sector. - Streamlined Processes: Removing bureaucratic hurdles could lead to more efficient defense cooperation between the U.S. and Cyprus.

Arguments in Opposition

- Regional Tensions: Critics worry that lifting restrictions could escalate tensions with Turkey, a NATO ally, given the historical disputes over Cyprus. - Risk of Misuse: There are concerns that without stringent checks, military equipment could be misused or diverted to unintended parties. - Diplomatic Balance: Opponents argue that the bill could upset the delicate balance of power in the region, affecting U.S. relations with other Eastern Mediterranean countries.
Sources7
Last updated 1/14/2026
  1. co
    congress.gov
  2. co
    congress.gov
  3. co
    congress.gov
  4. co
    congress.gov
  5. co
    congress.gov
  6. la
    lawreduce.com
  7. ho
    cha.house.gov

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding HR298: To eliminate certain limitations and exclusions regarding defense articles and requirements regardin | ModernAction