Modern Action logo

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding HR212: Capitol Remembrance Act

3 min read
The Capitol Remembrance Act, or H.R. 212, is a proposed bill that aims to create a permanent exhibit in the U.S. Capitol to commemorate the events of January 6, 2021. This exhibit would honor law enforcement officers and educate visitors about the attack on the Capitol.

What This Bill Does

The Capitol Remembrance Act is designed to create a permanent exhibit in the U.S. Capitol that depicts the events of January 6, 2021. This exhibit will be developed by the Architect of the Capitol, in consultation with the Joint Committee on the Library. It will include photographs and artifacts from the day, such as damaged property from the Capitol grounds, to provide a tangible record of the attack. One of the key features of the exhibit is a plaque that honors the U.S. Capitol Police and other law enforcement agencies that protected the Capitol during the attack. It will specifically recognize officers who were injured or lost their lives, including Capitol Police Officers Brian Sicknick and Howard Liebengood, and Metropolitan Police Officers Jeffrey Smith, Gunther Hashida, and Kyle DeFreytag. The exhibit may also include artwork that depicts the events of that day. The bill mandates that the exhibit be installed within two years of the bill's enactment. The necessary funds for the design and installation of the exhibit will be authorized until they are fully expended. This initiative does not amend any existing laws but adds a commemorative element to the Capitol's public spaces.

Why It Matters

The Capitol Remembrance Act holds significance as it seeks to honor the bravery and sacrifices of law enforcement officers who defended the Capitol on January 6, 2021. By creating a permanent exhibit, the bill aims to ensure that the events of that day are remembered and serve as a reminder of the threats to democracy. The exhibit will impact millions of visitors who come to the Capitol each year, including school groups and tourists. It will provide an educational experience, helping future generations understand the importance of protecting democratic processes. For law enforcement officers and their families, the exhibit offers recognition and honors their service and sacrifices.

Key Facts

  • Cost/Budget Impact: No specific cost estimates are available, but similar projects have ranged from $500K to $2M.
  • Timeline for Implementation: The exhibit must be installed within two years of the bill's enactment.
  • Number of People Affected: The exhibit will impact millions of visitors, including school groups and tourists.
  • Key Dates: The bill was introduced on January 6, 2025.
  • Partisan Support: All co-sponsors are Democrats, indicating a lack of bipartisan support.
  • Historical Context: The bill follows recommendations from the January 6 Committee and ongoing legal proceedings related to the attack.
  • Precedents: Similar memorials exist for events like Pearl Harbor and 9/11, preserving history through artifacts and education.

Arguments in Support

- Honors Law Enforcement and Victims: The exhibit recognizes the sacrifices of law enforcement officers and ensures their legacy is preserved. - Educates Future Generations: By providing a visual and tangible record of the events, the exhibit educates visitors about the risks to democracy. - Preserves Physical Evidence: Including damaged property from the Capitol helps document the destruction and serves as a historical record. - Promotes Healing and Acknowledgment: The exhibit honors the Capitol staff who restored the complex, fostering unity and resilience. - Fills a Gap in Capitol Memorials: It ensures that the events of January 6 are commemorated prominently in the Capitol.

Arguments in Opposition

- Politicizes a Sacred Space: Critics argue that a permanent exhibit could create a partisan narrative in a non-partisan venue. - Divides Rather Than Unites: Without bipartisan support, the exhibit could exacerbate national polarization over the attack. - Unnecessary Expense: The bill authorizes unspecified funds, which could be seen as wasteful amid fiscal pressures. - Risks Glorifying or Biasing History: Focusing on specific aspects might lead to a skewed educational narrative. - Premature Without Full Investigations: With ongoing legal cases, a fixed exhibit could prejudge narratives before all facts are known.
Sources8
Last updated 2/17/2026
  1. co
    congress.gov
  2. qu
    quiverquant.com
  3. co
    congress.gov
  4. co
    codifyupdates.com
  5. co
    congress.gov
  6. go
    govinfo.gov
  7. le
    legiscan.com
  8. ho
    live.house.gov

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding HR212: Capitol Remembrance Act | ModernAction