PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding HR1925: Emerging Digital Identity Ecosystem Report Act of 2025

3 min read
The Emerging Digital Identity Ecosystem Report Act of 2025 is a proposed law that asks the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to study and report on the use of digital identities in transportation. This bill aims to understand how digital IDs can improve security and competitiveness in the U.S., without creating new systems or changing existing laws.

What This Bill Does

The Emerging Digital Identity Ecosystem Report Act of 2025, known as H.R. 1925, is a bill that requires the TSA to prepare a detailed report on digital identity systems. This report is due to Congress within 180 days after the bill becomes law. The main goal is to assess the current state of digital identity technologies and their potential benefits and risks, especially in the transportation sector. The TSA will look into how digital identities, like those used in smartphones or biometric systems, can enhance homeland security. The report will also explore how these technologies might give the U.S. a competitive edge in the global market. Importantly, the bill does not require any new systems to be implemented; it simply calls for a study and a report. To create this report, the TSA must consult with various stakeholders. These include private companies that develop digital identity technologies, as well as state, local, Tribal, and territorial governments. By gathering input from these groups, the TSA aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the digital identity landscape. The bill does not change any existing laws or regulations. Instead, it serves as a fact-finding mission to inform future policy decisions. The findings will be submitted to the House and Senate Committees on Homeland Security, where they can be used to guide potential legislative actions.

Why It Matters

This bill could significantly impact how Americans experience travel, particularly in airports. By exploring digital identity technologies, the TSA might find ways to make security checks faster and more efficient. For example, using biometric data like facial recognition could reduce wait times at security checkpoints. However, there are also potential downsides. Some people might be concerned about privacy and how their personal data is used. The report will need to balance these concerns with the benefits of improved security and convenience. Overall, the bill aims to ensure that the U.S. stays competitive in the global market for digital identity technologies. This could lead to economic benefits and improved security for travelers, but it also raises important questions about privacy and data protection.

Key Facts

  • Cost/budget impact: No specific cost estimates are available, but the report is expected to be low-cost, utilizing existing TSA resources.
  • Timeline for implementation: The report is due within 180 days of the bill's enactment.
  • Number of people affected: While the bill focuses on the transportation sector, it could indirectly affect millions of travelers.
  • Key dates: The bill was introduced on March 6, 2025, and is currently stalled in a subcommittee.
  • Bipartisan support: The bill was introduced by a Republican and a Democrat, highlighting its bipartisan nature.
  • Focus on transportation: The bill specifically targets the transportation sector, where identity fraud is a significant issue.
  • Global context: The bill positions the U.S. to compete with other countries advancing in digital identity technologies.

Arguments in Support

- Informs policy on security enhancements: Supporters believe the bill will help identify how digital IDs can improve transportation security, reducing vulnerabilities like identity fraud. - Balances risks and benefits: The report will evaluate both the advantages and potential downsides, allowing for informed decision-making. - Boosts U.S. competitiveness: By examining digital ID innovations, the bill could help the U.S. gain an economic edge in a growing global market. - Stakeholder-inclusive approach: The bill mandates input from various stakeholders, promoting collaboration and avoiding siloed development. - Low-cost information gathering: Since the bill only requires a report, it encourages innovation without the need for costly new systems.

Arguments in Opposition

- Privacy and surveillance risks: Critics worry that the report could lead to federal tracking systems, raising concerns about privacy. - Mission creep for TSA: Some argue that focusing on digital IDs might divert resources from the TSA's core mission of aviation security. - Corporate influence: There are concerns that input from private companies might prioritize profits over public interest. - Unnecessary bureaucracy: Opponents believe the bill duplicates existing efforts and could waste taxpayer money. - Equity issues: Digital IDs might exclude people without access to smartphones, exacerbating existing divides.
Sources10
Last updated 1/15/2026
  1. co
    congress.gov
  2. qu
    quiverquant.com
  3. co
    congress.gov
  4. co
    congress.gov
  5. le
    legiscan.com
  6. go
    govinfo.gov
  7. co
    congress.gov
  8. go
    govtrack.us
  9. co
    codifylegalpublishing.com
  10. go
    govinfo.gov

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding HR1925: Emerging Digital Identity Ecosystem Report Act of 2025 | ModernAction