The Strengthening Cooperation and Security in the Middle East Act, or H.R. 1385, is a proposed bill that aims to enhance security and economic collaboration among Middle Eastern countries and the United States. It focuses on expanding the Comprehensive Security Integration and Prosperity Agreement (CSIPA) to include more nations, fostering stronger alliances and addressing regional threats.
What This Bill Does
H.R. 1385 requires the U.S. Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, to create a detailed report within 180 days of the bill's enactment. This report will outline a strategy to increase the number of countries participating in the Comprehensive Security Integration and Prosperity Agreement (CSIPA), which was signed in Washington, D.C., in September 2023. The report will also analyze the strategic benefits of CSIPA, such as improving military readiness, enhancing economic interests, and promoting collaboration in technology and science.
The bill specifically addresses threats like the Houthi attacks on merchant vessels in the Red Sea, which have disrupted global shipping. It suggests leveraging the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet in Bahrain to counter these threats and build regional resilience. The report will also explore the long-term benefits of expanding CSIPA and identify any barriers in the U.S.-Bahrain relationship that might hinder collaboration.
After the initial report is submitted, the Secretary of State must then develop a strategy to engage both Middle Eastern and non-Middle Eastern allies to join CSIPA. This strategy will include specific steps to encourage participation and will be followed by a briefing to Congress within 60 days. It's important to note that this bill does not change existing laws or authorize new funding; it simply mandates the creation of planning documents.
Why It Matters
The bill could have a significant impact on global trade and security. By expanding CSIPA, the U.S. aims to improve military readiness and economic cooperation in the Middle East. This could lead to more coordinated military exercises and operations, helping to address threats like the Houthi attacks that have disrupted shipping routes and increased costs for goods worldwide.
For everyday Americans, this bill could indirectly affect the prices of consumer goods. The Houthi attacks have already raised shipping costs, which in turn have increased prices for items like groceries and gas. By stabilizing trade routes in the Red Sea, the bill could help lower these costs, benefiting American families. Additionally, the bill supports U.S. troops stationed in the region, potentially reducing risks for service members and their families.
Key Facts
- Cost/Budget Impact: The bill does not authorize new spending; similar mandates typically cost under $1 million in staff time.
- Timeline for Implementation: The report is due 180 days post-enactment, followed by a strategy 180 days later, and a congressional briefing 60 days after that.
- Number of People Affected: Primarily affects U.S. government officials, Middle Eastern nations, and industries like defense and shipping.
- Key Dates: Introduced on February 14, 2025; remains in committee as of December 16, 2025.
- Bipartisan Support: Sponsored by Rep. Carol Miller (R-WV) and Rep. Jimmy Panetta (D-CA), showcasing cross-party collaboration.
- Historical Context: Builds on the Abraham Accords and addresses recent Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping.
- Current Status: The bill is still in the House Committee on Foreign Affairs with no further action taken.
Arguments in Support
- Improves military readiness: Supporters argue that the bill will enhance joint military exercises and operations, addressing gaps in security exposed by recent threats.
- Enhances economic interests: By expanding trade and investment among CSIPA members, the bill aims to build on the prosperity seen from the Abraham Accords.
- Promotes technology collaboration: The bill encourages joint research and development in advanced technology fields like AI and cybersecurity.
- Builds regional resilience: By countering threats from adversaries like Iran, the bill aims to strengthen regional security.
- Leverages U.S. assets: Expanding CSIPA could reduce the unilateral burden on the U.S., projecting strength and stability in the region.
Arguments in Opposition
- No direct opposition recorded: As the bill is still in committee, no formal opposition has been documented.
- Potential concerns: Critics might worry about the bill's narrow scope, as it only mandates reports and strategies without immediate action.
- Lack of funding: Some may argue that the bill does not authorize new funding, which could limit its effectiveness.
- Focus on foreign policy: Opponents might prefer domestic priorities over foreign policy initiatives.
- Uncertain impact: Without concrete actions, the bill's impact on security and economic cooperation remains speculative.
