The Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program Act of 1994 is getting a fresh boost with H.R. 1098. This bill aims to keep the program running until 2031, helping kids learn about conservation through art while supporting wetland habitats across the U.S.
What This Bill Does
H.R. 1098 is all about keeping the Junior Duck Stamp Program alive and well. This program teaches kids under 16 about the importance of conserving waterfowl and wetlands through art contests. The bill extends the program's funding through 2031, ensuring it has the resources it needs to continue.
The bill authorizes $350,000 each year for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to manage the program. This money comes from existing funds, so there's no new spending involved. The program also sells $5 stamps, which are collectibles and not for hunting, to raise money for wetland conservation.
Another change the bill makes is to clarify which states and territories can participate. It specifies that the program includes all 50 states, Washington D.C., Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands. However, it excludes smaller territories, which might limit some participation.
Finally, the bill ensures that no additional funds will be required beyond what's already allocated to the Federal Duck Stamp Office. This means the program will continue to operate within its existing budget, focusing on using resources efficiently.
Why It Matters
This bill has a significant impact on young people and the environment. By participating in the Junior Duck Stamp Program, thousands of students across the country learn about the importance of conserving wetlands and protecting wildlife. This hands-on education can inspire the next generation of environmental stewards.
For everyday Americans, the program helps maintain healthy wetlands, which are crucial for clean water and biodiversity. Wetlands act as natural filters, providing clean water to a third of the U.S. population. They also support a wide range of wildlife, including ducks that help control pests, benefiting farmers and the broader ecosystem.
The program's art contests also bring communities together, fostering pride and awareness about local conservation efforts. For example, a student from Texas who wins the contest can bring attention to the importance of preserving local habitats.
Key Facts
- Cost/Budget Impact: The bill authorizes $350,000 annually, totaling $2 million over six years, funded from existing appropriations.
- Timeline for Implementation: The reauthorization takes effect immediately for fiscal years 2025-2031.
- Number of People Affected: Tens of thousands of students participate annually, along with educators and conservationists.
- Key Dates: Introduced on February 6, 2025, and reported to the House on December 9, 2025.
- No New Spending: The program operates within the existing budget of the Federal Duck Stamp Office.
- Youth Engagement: The program is one of the largest youth art contests globally, with over 25,000 entries each year.
- Bipartisan Sponsorship: The bill is sponsored by representatives from both major political parties, reflecting its broad support.
Arguments in Support
- Educational Impact: The program educates thousands of students about conservation, fostering a love for nature and art.
- Cost-Effective: With only $350,000 annually from existing funds, it provides significant environmental benefits without new taxes.
- Bipartisan Support: The bill has backing from both parties, showing its broad appeal and importance.
- Habitat Protection: Stamp sales have historically raised millions for wetland conservation, helping protect vital ecosystems.
- Focus on Core Participants: Clarifying the definition of "State" ensures resources are used efficiently.
Arguments in Opposition
- Questionable Need for Reauthorization: Some may argue the program has operated without formal reauthorization since 2010, questioning the necessity.
- Exclusion of Territories: The exclusion of smaller territories might limit participation and educational opportunities for those regions.
- Opportunity Cost: Critics could point to the $2 million total spend over six years as money that could be used for other conservation priorities.
