PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding H.R.537: INCREASE Housing Affordability Act

3 min read
The INCREASE Housing Affordability Act, or H.R. 537, aims to make housing more affordable by turning empty office buildings into homes. This bill offers tax incentives to property owners who convert unused commercial spaces into residential units, helping to address the housing shortage without building new structures.

What This Bill Does

The INCREASE Housing Affordability Act is designed to tackle the housing crisis by encouraging the conversion of non-residential buildings, like empty office spaces, into homes. This approach is particularly relevant in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, which left many office buildings underutilized due to the rise of remote work. The bill proposes tax credits or incentives for property owners who choose to transform their commercial spaces into residential housing. This means that if a building owner decides to convert an old office building into apartments, they could receive financial benefits, making the conversion more appealing and financially viable. By amending sections of the Internal Revenue Code, the bill provides these incentives, although the exact details, such as the amount of tax credit or specific eligibility criteria, are outlined in the full text of the bill. The focus is on repurposing existing structures rather than constructing new buildings, which can be more time-consuming and costly. This legislation targets cities with high vacancy rates in commercial properties, aiming to increase the housing supply where it's needed most. By doing so, it hopes to lower housing costs and make homes more accessible to people who are struggling with high rents and home prices.

Why It Matters

The bill could have a significant impact on people living in urban areas where housing is scarce and expensive. By converting empty office buildings into homes, the supply of available housing units would increase, potentially lowering rents and making it easier for people to find affordable places to live. Renters and potential homebuyers stand to benefit the most from this bill. For example, young families or low-income individuals in cities like New York or Los Angeles, where the cost of living is high, could find more affordable housing options. This could lead to savings on rent, allowing families to allocate their income to other essential needs. Moreover, the bill addresses the issue of vacant commercial spaces, which have become more common due to the shift towards remote work. By repurposing these spaces, cities can make better use of their existing infrastructure, potentially revitalizing areas that have seen a decline in commercial activity.

Key Facts

  • Cost/Budget Impact: No specific budget estimates are available, but the bill involves tax expenditures.
  • Timeline for Implementation: Provisions would apply upon enactment, likely affecting the subsequent tax year.
  • Number of People Affected: Primarily targets urban renters and homebuyers in high-cost cities.
  • Key Dates: Introduced in the 119th Congress (2025-2026), with limited actions recorded so far.
  • Pandemic Influence: Addresses office vacancies resulting from the shift to remote work.
  • Legislative Progress: Minimal activity with no cosponsors or committee referrals, indicating a low likelihood of passage.
  • Potential Precedents: Similar state-level initiatives exist, but no federal examples are directly linked to this bill.

Arguments in Support

- Addresses Housing Shortages: Converts unused office spaces into homes, increasing the housing supply without needing new land. - Cost-Effective Solution: Utilizes existing buildings, which can be cheaper and faster than new construction. - Revitalizes Urban Areas: Brings life back to underused parts of cities, potentially boosting local economies. - Environmental Benefits: Reduces the need for new construction, which can be resource-intensive and environmentally damaging. - Adaptability: Provides a flexible solution to the changing landscape of work and living spaces post-pandemic.

Arguments in Opposition

- Potential Tax Revenue Loss: Offering tax credits could reduce government revenue, impacting public services. - Urban Density Concerns: Increased residential density in urban areas might strain infrastructure and services. - Uncertain Market Impact: The effectiveness of conversions in significantly lowering housing costs is not guaranteed. - Limited Scope: Focuses primarily on urban areas, potentially neglecting rural housing needs. - Implementation Challenges: Converting commercial spaces to residential use can be complex and costly, potentially limiting participation.
Sources7
Last updated 12/30/2025
  1. co
    congress.gov
  2. co
    congress.gov
  3. co
    congress.gov
  4. co
    congress.gov
  5. co
    congress.gov
  6. qu
    quiverquant.com
  7. fa
    fastdemocracy.com

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding H.R.537: INCREASE Housing Affordability Act | ModernAction