PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding H.R.4024: Filling Public Safety Vacancies Act

3 min read
The Filling Public Safety Vacancies Act, or H.R. 4024, is a proposed law aimed at helping police departments fill empty positions by providing extra funding. This bill is designed to help communities by ensuring there are enough officers to keep neighborhoods safe and respond quickly to emergencies.

What This Bill Does

The Filling Public Safety Vacancies Act is a piece of legislation that seeks to address the issue of understaffed police departments across the United States. It does this by providing additional funding specifically for hiring or rehiring law enforcement officers. The bill amends existing grant programs under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, which means it builds on laws that already exist to support public safety. In simpler terms, this bill would allow more money to be given to state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies. These funds are meant to help these agencies hire new officers or bring back officers who have left, such as retirees. The goal is to fill the gaps in staffing that many police departments are currently facing. The bill does not change any broader law enforcement policies or the qualifications needed to become an officer. Instead, it focuses solely on providing the financial resources needed to ensure that there are enough officers on the streets. This is particularly important in areas that have been struggling with high vacancy rates, which can lead to slower response times and increased crime rates.

Why It Matters

This bill has the potential to make a significant difference in the lives of everyday Americans. By providing funding to hire more officers, it aims to improve public safety and reduce crime rates. For communities that have been experiencing longer wait times for police responses, this could mean faster help in emergencies and a greater sense of security. The primary beneficiaries of this bill would be state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies that are currently understaffed. This includes small municipal police departments and rural tribal forces that often face higher shortages. For residents in these areas, having more officers could mean fewer unsolved crimes and a quicker response to 911 calls. Moreover, by focusing on hiring and rehiring officers, the bill seeks to address the experience gap that can occur when new recruits are brought in. Retirees and experienced officers can be rehired, bringing valuable knowledge and skills back to the force.

Key Facts

  • Cost/Budget Impact: While no specific cost estimate is available, similar programs have been funded at hundreds of millions annually.
  • Timeline for Implementation: If passed, the grants would likely be available in the next fiscal year, with funds disbursed within 90-180 days.
  • Number of People Affected: The bill targets law enforcement agencies with staffing shortages, impacting communities across urban and rural areas.
  • Key Dates: The bill was introduced on June 17, 2025, and is currently in the early stages of the legislative process.
  • Solo Sponsorship: Introduced by Rep. Salud Carbajal without any cosponsors, which is unusual for such bills.
  • Historical Context: The bill comes amid ongoing police shortages and rising crime rates, echoing past efforts like the 1994 Crime Bill.
  • Focus on Rehiring: The bill explicitly allows for the rehiring of retirees, addressing experience gaps in law enforcement agencies.

Arguments in Support

- Addresses Staffing Shortages: The bill provides funds specifically to fill vacancies in law enforcement, which is crucial given the reported 30,000 vacancies in U.S. police departments. - Enhances Public Safety: More officers on the streets can lead to reduced crime rates and faster response times, improving overall community safety. - Supports Under-Resourced Agencies: Small and rural departments that struggle with budget constraints would receive much-needed financial relief to hire more officers.

Arguments in Opposition

- Fiscal Concerns: Critics argue that the bill could add to federal spending without guaranteeing long-term impact, especially given the national debt. - Lack of Reform Focus: Some worry that increasing officer numbers without addressing training or accountability could lead to issues similar to those seen in the past. - Opportunity Cost: Opponents suggest that funds might be better spent on mental health or social services, which could also reduce crime rates effectively.
Sources8
Last updated 12/29/2025
  1. pl
    pluralpolicy.com
  2. co
    codifylegalpublishing.com
  3. qu
    quiverquant.com
  4. co
    congress.gov
  5. co
    congress.gov
  6. co
    congress.gov
  7. go
    govinfo.gov
  8. go
    govtrack.us

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding H.R.4024: Filling Public Safety Vacancies Act | ModernAction