PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding H.R.1329: Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum Act

3 min read
The Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum Act, or H.R.1329, is a proposed law aiming to create a new museum dedicated to American women's history on the National Mall in Washington, D.C. This bill seeks to honor the diverse contributions of women throughout U.S. history, from pioneers and activists to scientists and artists.

What This Bill Does

The Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum Act is designed to establish a new museum that focuses on the history and achievements of American women. The bill outlines a plan for the Smithsonian Institution's Board of Regents to create this museum on the National Mall. Within ten years of the bill's passage, the Board must complete a planning and design phase. This includes selecting a site, creating a conceptual design, and developing fundraising plans. The museum will feature exhibits, programs, and collections that highlight the roles and contributions of women in various fields, such as science, politics, and the arts. The bill authorizes federal funds for planning but requires that at least half of the construction costs come from private sources. This approach aims to balance public investment with private support. Additionally, the bill amends existing Smithsonian laws to include this new museum, similar to previous expansions like the National Museum of African American History and Culture. This legislative step builds on a 2020 authorization that allowed for the museum's creation in principle but did not provide for a physical building.

Why It Matters

This bill has the potential to significantly impact how American history is told and understood. By creating a dedicated space for women's history, it addresses the historical underrepresentation of women in national narratives. This museum could serve as an educational resource for millions of visitors each year, inspiring future generations by showcasing the achievements of women from diverse backgrounds. The museum would benefit a wide range of people, including students, educators, and historians, by providing a comprehensive view of women's contributions to society. It also promises to boost tourism and the local economy in Washington, D.C., drawing visitors from across the country and around the world.

Key Facts

  • Cost/Budget Impact: No official cost estimate yet, but similar projects have cost between $400-600 million.
  • Timeline for Implementation: Planning and design must be completed within 10 years, with construction potentially taking 15-20 years.
  • Number of People Affected: The museum would benefit women, students, educators, and the tourism industry.
  • Key Dates: The bill was introduced on February 13, 2025, and is currently in committee.
  • Bipartisan Support: The bill has 140 cosponsors from both parties, indicating strong political backing.
  • Private Funding Requirement: At least 50% of construction costs must come from non-federal sources.
  • Historical Context: Builds on a 2020 authorization and decades of advocacy for a women's history museum.

Arguments in Support

- Filling a Gap in National Storytelling: Supporters argue that the museum addresses the lack of representation of women's history in national museums. - Educational and Inspirational Value: The museum could inspire young girls and promote greater participation in fields like STEM. - Celebrating Diversity and Inclusion: It would highlight the contributions of women from various backgrounds, including women of color and LGBTQ+ women. - Economic and Tourism Benefits: Similar museums have generated significant economic impact through increased tourism. - Bipartisan Support: The bill has broad support from both political parties, symbolizing national unity.

Arguments in Opposition

- High Construction Costs: Critics may point to the significant costs involved, especially given current federal budget constraints. - Opportunity Costs: Some argue that funds could be better spent on other priorities like infrastructure or veterans' services. - Perceived Redundancy: Opponents might claim that existing exhibits already cover women's history adequately. - Land Use Concerns: The crowded National Mall may not have space for another large museum, potentially delaying other projects.
Sources8
Last updated 1/14/2026
  1. bi
    billsponsor.com
  2. co
    congress.gov
  3. co
    congress.gov
  4. co
    congress.gov
  5. co
    congress.gov
  6. ev
    everycrsreport.com
  7. pl
    open.pluralpolicy.com
  8. co
    congress.gov

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding H.R.1329: Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum Act | ModernAction