PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates

Take Action on This Bill

Understanding H.R.1156: Pandemic Unemployment Fraud Enforcement Act

3 min read
The Pandemic Unemployment Fraud Enforcement Act, or H.R.1156, is a proposed law aiming to crack down on fraudsters who took advantage of pandemic unemployment programs. By extending the time prosecutors have to bring charges from 5 to 10 years, the bill seeks to recover stolen taxpayer money and ensure justice is served.

What This Bill Does

H.R.1156 is all about giving law enforcement more time to catch and prosecute those who committed fraud during the pandemic. Right now, there's a 5-year limit on how long they have to bring these cases to court. This bill wants to extend that limit to 10 years. Why? Because investigating these cases can be really complicated and take a long time, especially when it involves things like identity theft or organized crime rings. The bill specifically targets fraud in four major unemployment programs that were set up during the COVID-19 pandemic. These programs were meant to help people who lost their jobs, but unfortunately, they also became targets for criminals. By extending the time frame for prosecution, the bill aims to make sure these criminals can't just wait out the clock and escape justice. Another important part of the bill is that it rescinds $5 million in unused funds from the Department of Labor to help cover the costs of these extended investigations. This means the bill is trying to be financially responsible by using money that was already set aside but not used.

Why It Matters

This bill is important because it aims to protect taxpayer money. During the pandemic, a lot of money was set aside to help people who lost their jobs. Unfortunately, a significant portion of that money was stolen through fraud. By giving prosecutors more time to go after these criminals, the bill hopes to recover some of that money and return it to the public. For everyday Americans, this means more accountability and a better chance that the funds meant to help those in need actually reach them. It also sends a strong message that fraud will not be tolerated, which could deter future criminals from trying similar schemes. On the flip side, the bill could also affect people who received unemployment benefits during the pandemic. If their claims are flagged for fraud, they might be subject to investigation. However, the bill aims to focus on those who intentionally committed fraud, not those who made honest mistakes.

Key Facts

  • Cost/Budget Impact: The bill rescinds $5 million in unused funds to cover its implementation costs.
  • Timeline for Implementation: The bill would take effect immediately upon enactment, extending the statute of limitations to 10 years.
  • Number of People Affected: Potentially impacts thousands involved in pandemic unemployment fraud cases.
  • Key Dates: The current statute of limitations expires on March 27, 2025; the bill aims to extend this to March 27, 2030.
  • Real-World Impact: Estimated $135 billion was stolen from pandemic unemployment programs, highlighting the need for extended prosecution time.
  • Broad Support: Endorsed by federal agencies and state workforce organizations, indicating strong institutional backing.
  • Historical Context: Similar extensions have been made for other federal programs in response to large-scale fraud.

Arguments in Support

- More Time for Justice: Extending the statute of limitations gives law enforcement more time to investigate and prosecute complex fraud cases. - Protects Taxpayer Money: By recovering stolen funds, the bill aims to return money to the public that was meant for pandemic relief. - Closes Loopholes: Criminals who exploited the system won't be able to escape prosecution just because time runs out. - Bipartisan Support: The bill has backing from various government agencies and organizations, indicating broad agreement on its necessity. - Fiscal Responsibility: By using unused funds from the Department of Labor, the bill offsets its costs without needing additional taxpayer money.

Arguments in Opposition

- Increased Administrative Burden: Extending the time for prosecution means states have to keep records longer, which can be costly and burdensome. - Diminished Evidence Quality: As time passes, evidence may degrade, making it harder to prosecute cases effectively. - Impact on Individuals: Some worry that people who made honest mistakes could be unfairly targeted years later. - Resource Allocation: Critics argue that resources might be better spent on preventing current fraud rather than focusing on past cases. - Privacy Concerns: Keeping personal data for longer periods could raise privacy issues for those who received benefits.
Sources7
Last updated 10/13/2025
  1. wh
    whitehouse.gov
  2. ho
    waysandmeans.house.gov
  3. co
    congress.gov
  4. ho
    waysandmeans.house.gov
  5. co
    congress.gov
  6. cb
    cbo.gov
  7. le
    legiscan.com

Make Your Voice Heard

Take action on this bill and let your representatives know where you stand.

Understanding H.R.1156: Pandemic Unemployment Fraud Enforcement Act | ModernAction