Trump announces progress on Iran deal negotiations
U.S. and Iranian officials are reportedly close to finalizing an agreement to address the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. President Trump stated that the deal is 'largely negotiated.' (sources: theguardian, dw, nbcnews, thehill, foxnews)
President Trump indicated that a deal to end the Iran war is nearly complete, with discussions ongoing between the U.S. and Iran. He mentioned that the Strait of Hormuz would be opened as part of the agreement.
- Trump stated that an agreement has been largely negotiated between the U.S. and Iran.
- The negotiations aim to address the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.
- The opening of the Strait of Hormuz is mentioned as part of the potential deal.
Why it matters
The outcome of these negotiations could significantly impact regional stability and international trade routes.
↓ Why this is on ModernAction
4 bills on this issue are moving right now — and the most active one is A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress..
SJRES104 · 119th Congress
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
Where do you stand on this bill?
Takes about 60 seconds
About this bill
What SJRES104 actually does
This story is about Iran war: Trump says deal 'largely negotiated'. This bill would If news is accurate that an “Iran war” is underway (or imminent) while a “deal” is being discussed, this is a direct congressional lever to.
If passed, it would:
- Direct the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities within/against Iran unless Congress declares war or • Preserve authorities like defending against attacks elsewhere and intelligence-sharing/defensive support to Israel and.
3 other bills moving on this issue
Take action on any of them individually.
This story is about Iran war: Trump says deal 'largely negotiated'. This bill would If a “deal” is being framed around ending or avoiding war, enforcement-focused sanctions bills like this would materially affect Iran’s oil-re.
If passed, it would
- Require sanctions on persons involved in logistical transactions/sanctions evasion tied to Iranian oil, gas, LNG • Impose immigration-related consequences (inadmissibility/visa ineligibility) for covered individuals.
This story is about Iran war: Trump says deal 'largely negotiated'. This bill would Make the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 permanent by eliminating its sunset clause.
If passed, it would
- Make the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 permanent by eliminating its sunset clause • Keep the statute’s sanctions framework in place unless changed by later law.
This story is about Iran war: Trump says deal 'largely negotiated'. This bill would If the news is about negotiating an Iran-war “deal,” this bill targets the core question of whether federal funds would be used for U.S. milit.
If passed, it would
- Bar obligating/spending federal funds for military force in or against Iran absent a declaration of war or specific • Limit relying on older authorities as a basis for war with Iran (per bill text structure.
Top coverage · 9 sources