Trump announces largely negotiated Iran peace deal
A memorandum of understanding on a peace deal with Iran has been described as 'largely negotiated' by U.S. President Trump. This development raises expectations regarding the ongoing conflict in the region. (sources: france24, aljazeera, theguardian, dw, nbcnews)
Trump stated that a peace deal with Iran is 'largely negotiated' and would lead to the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. This announcement comes amid ongoing tensions in the region.
- Trump mentioned a memorandum of understanding on a peace deal with Iran.
- The deal is said to be 'largely negotiated' according to Trump.
- The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz is part of the proposed agreement.
Why it matters
The Strait of Hormuz is a critical waterway for global oil shipments, and a peace deal could impact regional stability.
↓ Why this is on ModernAction
5 bills on this issue are moving right now — and the most active one is A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress..
SJRES104 · 119th Congress
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
Where do you stand on this bill?
Takes about 60 seconds
About this bill
What SJRES104 actually does
This story is about Iran war: Trump says deal 'largely negotiated'. This bill would If the U.S. is negotiating an end to an “Iran war,” this is a direct congressional lever over continued U.S. hostilities absent explicit aut.
If passed, it would:
- Direct the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities “within or against Iran” unless Congress authorizes • Put Congress formally on record about whether U.S. forces should remain engaged in Iran-related hostilities.
4 other bills moving on this issue
Take action on any of them individually.
This story is about Iran war: Trump says deal 'largely negotiated'. This bill would Direct the President to terminate the use of U.S. Armed Forces in hostilities against Iran unless Congress authorizes it.
If passed, it would
- Direct the President to terminate the use of U.S. Armed Forces in hostilities against Iran unless Congress authorizes • Clarify it is not itself an authorization for force and includes a self-defense/imminent-attack rule of construction.
This story is about Iran war: Trump says deal 'largely negotiated'. This bill would If the “deal” involves Iran sanctions (tightening, enforcement, or potential relief), this bill is a major live sanctions vehicle with docum.
If passed, it would
- Expand/require sanctions targeting Iran-related oil/gas/petrochemical logistics and sanctions evasion • Set waiver/reporting conditions for sanctions implementation.
This story is about Iran war: Trump says deal 'largely negotiated'. This bill would If Trump’s “largely negotiated” deal would require waiving/terminating Iran sanctions, this bill creates a specific congressional review/app.
If passed, it would
- Require reporting to Congress before major Iran-sanctions termination/waiver actions • Create a formal congressional review window for approval/disapproval measures.
This story is about Iran war: Trump says deal 'largely negotiated'. This bill would If the news is about negotiating an Iran-war “deal,” this bill targets the core question of whether federal funds would be used for U.S. milit.
If passed, it would
- Bar obligating/spending federal funds for military force in or against Iran absent a declaration of war or specific • Limit relying on older authorities as a basis for war with Iran (per bill text structure.
Top coverage · 11 sources